Is advocating land circulation and land privatization beneficial or harmful to the peasants?

Mondo Three rural Updated on 2024-01-19

In recent years, China'sAgricultureThere has been a heated debate about the privatization and circulation of land. Different schools of thought have put forward their own opinions, but in practice, have these theories been confirmed?This article will focus on land privatization and circulationFarmersimpact.

Privatization of land is considered a precondition for free market transactions and large-scale operations, which can only be granted if property rights are clearFarmersInvestmentsAgriculture, the formation of large-scale production, operation and management mode, so as to improve production efficiency. However, in China's practice, land privatization has encountered many difficulties.

China's land resources are not only scarce, but also scattered, diversified, and have obvious regional characteristics. At the same time, the limited term of land contracts has led to more and more serious land fragmentation and smaller planting areas. SomeEconomyThe scale of land in the hands of weaker farmers is only a few dozen mu, and it is difficult to support the long-term balance between input and output. Farmers in mountainous areas and disadvantaged groups are even more unable to pass throughLand circulationand scale operations obtainedEconomyThe benefits are often occupied and used by a large number of foreign enterprises and individuals without compensation, which aggravates the contradictions and social instability of land rights and interests disputes. In addition, land privatization also increases land transaction costs, encourages the possibility of speculation and speculation, and is essential for revitalizationRuralEconomy, implementationFarmersTargets such as revenue increase and food safety management have had a negative impact.

Therefore, simply privatization of land will not solve the problemFarmersIncrease revenue andAgricultureOn the issue of development, we need to carry out institutional reforms to improve the land valueEquityto make the land function more efficiently.

The implementation of the farmland transfer policy has enabled many peasant households to pool their land and obtain some by relying on large-scale operationsEconomyBenefit. However, empirical experience and data have shown that economies of scale are not universal, but are confined to large enterprises and advantageous production areas in the plantation industry. EarlyLand circulationMost of them are concentrated in suburban areas and developed coastal areas, resulting inRuralUnbalanced internal and external development. When these areas meet a certain market demand, there will also be problems such as capital concentration, excess goods, and poor qualityAgricultureindustrialSustainabilityAdverse effects.

At the same time, the cross-border contact between the transferred land and capital has been brought aboutEconomies of scaleeffect, again with the practicalAgricultureThe disconnection between production and operation has caused a waste of capital, loss andAgricultureMistakes in investment are not conducive toFarmershas widened the gap between the rich and the poor.

Therefore,Land circulationThe practice reflects a lot of limitations and limitations, and is not a completely reliable oneEconomyMeans.

In the practice of land privatization and circulation, we should recognize its existing problems and limitations, and seek better solutions.

At present, China's land reform has reached a historic peak. The contents of the reform include the circulation of land contract management rights, the extension of the contract period, the protection of land quality, and compensation for land expropriation. These reforms are designed to safeguardFarmersland rights, promotedAgricultureof modernization andSustainability

Only the people own the land,FarmersThe rights and interests of the land are protectedAgriculturein order to truly prosper.

Judging from my personal thinking and experience, the privatization and circulation of land is indeed right to a certain extentFarmersThere were some negative effects. ManyFarmersThe land is small, and it faces the problem of decreasing planting area and input-output balance. At the same time,Land circulationto some regionsRuralThe industrial structure and development pattern have had an uneven impact.

Therefore, in the process of promoting land privatization and circulation, we must pay attention to solving the problem of rational allocation and protection of land resourcesFarmersland interests. At the same time, institutional reforms should be strengthened to improve the land incomeEquityand utilization efficiency, driving modernityAgriculturedevelopment, realizationFarmersof the increase in revenue andAgricultureofSustainability

In conclusion, there are some problems and limitations in the practice of land privatization and circulation in China. We should recognize these problems and formulate better land-use policies through institutional reforms to make land work more effectively. Strengthen the study and practice of policy summarization, further improve the defects and limitations of the existing land system, and promote modernizationAgricultureThe development of the broad, let the vastFarmersBenefit. That's what makes it happenAgricultureofSustainabilitywithFarmersis the key to increasing revenue.

Related Pages