Shocked!The global revolution has brought about the end of US hegemony

Mondo International Updated on 2024-01-29

For many years, the United States, which has always regarded itself as the "world's policeman," has recently frequently reported unfavorable news, and it seems that it is becoming more and more difficult on the road of hegemonism. First, South Korea's parliament passed an amendment to the Telecommunications Business Act that would restrict the "forcible commission" of U.S. tech giants in South Korea's app stores. This may signal that South Korea is no longer bound by Western labels, and may trigger more countries to follow suit, becoming a "nightmare" for the United States.

Once the bill goes into effect, it will make South Korea the first country in the world to resist U.S. technology hegemony. However, it is difficult to predict whether South Korea will be able to withstand the pressure of the United States in this "power game". Currently, Google occupies 72 percent of South Korea's mobile payment market1%, and Apple occupies 92%, and the two together reach 80%. If this bill succeeds, the United States will lose South Korea's huge market, and this may be just the beginning, and more countries may follow suit and become a stumbling block to American hegemony.

Precursor to the Sea Breeze 2021 joint military exercise and South Korea's desire to regain military power, South Korea's "anti-water" move against the United States shows that it is increasingly eager to break free from American control. Regardless of the final outcome, this incident has planted "seeds" in Western countries, and the United States will face more doubts and rebellions from many more countries.

The second piece of news that disgraced the United States came from the European Union. Due to the continuous "deterioration" of the epidemic situation in the United States, the European Union has decided to remove the United States from the "EU Safe Travel List", and recommends that member states adopt epidemic prevention restrictions on the entry of American travelers. The decision stems from the fact that the cumulative number of confirmed cases in the United States has exceeded 40.76 million, and the death toll has reached 6660,000, with more than 450 confirmed cases per million people in a single day. Compared to the 57% vaccination rate in the European Union, the 25% vaccination rate in the United States is weak.

In addition, the spread of the Delta strain has become the main culprit of the new round of epidemics, and the controversy over mask wearing in the United States has also alarmed the European Union. In the past, the United States had an unequal attitude towards the European Union in the entry restriction regulations, and now the United States itself is facing the same restrictions, which has become a situation of "one report for one report".

Together, these two pieces of news form a picture of the growing gloom of American hegemony. Whether it is challenges in the field of science and technology or mistakes in epidemic prevention and control, the United States is facing a serious crisis of confidence. In the future, where will the United States go?This is a high-profile issue, and we'll see.

This article profoundly examines a series of problems facing the United States in the current international political landscape, from South Korea's restrictions on American tech giants to the European Union's restrictions on American travelers, presenting a picture of the gradual decline of American hegemony. This moment sparked me to think deeply about international relations and the global balance of power.

First of all, the National Assembly passed the amendment to the Telecommunications Business Act, which shows that South Korea is becoming more independent and independent in international affairs. This is not just a bill about the technology industry, but also a challenge to US hegemony. South Korea's courage to stand up and curb the monopolistic practices of American technology companies shows its determination to defend its national interests. Such a move will not only have a huge impact on the US market in South Korea, but may also trigger other countries to reflect on and confront US hegemony in the international community.

Second, the EU's removal of the US from the Safe Travel List and the imposition of pandemic restrictions on US travelers reflect the international community's dissatisfaction and concern about the poor epidemic prevention and control in the US. As a former international leader, America's reputation has been greatly affected by its performance during the pandemic. The EU's decision is not just a response to a health crisis, but also a manifestation of a crisis of confidence in the United States in international affairs. It also provides a way for other countries to counter US hegemony by imposing restrictions on the US to protect their own interests.

The article also mentions the asymmetrical attitude of the United States in international affairs, such as its inconsistent treatment of entry restrictions. This kind of double standard has attracted widespread attention from the international community and has also become a major obstacle for the United States in maintaining global order. The international community expects the United States to perform its global leadership role more justly and responsibly, instead of pursuing its own interests and ignoring the legitimate rights and interests of other countries.

Overall, this article provides a panorama of the serious challenges facing the United States in the era of globalization. The United States has been a central force in international affairs for the past few decades, but the problems it faces today show that the global balance of power is changing profoundly. In the future, the United States needs to review its role in international affairs, actively respond to challenges, and participate in global affairs in a more responsible and cooperative manner.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages