Huang Ling, a police officer of the Hubei Provincial Prison Administration, was dismissed from public office by the "Hubei Provincial Fire Equipment Factory", which violated public order and good customs, whether in terms of national laws and regulations, or human morality and conscience.
This equipment factory is not an administrative organization, so naturally it is not an administrative body, and of course, it cannot encroach on administrative functions This is an undoubted non-publication theory.
Huang Ling is a police officer who has been awarded the rank of police officer by the Hubei Provincial Department of Justice, and she is a manager. The police are included in the state treasury, and the enterprises are indeed self-financed. Two very different concepts, how can they be "in the same vein"!
Behind this absurd corporate dismissal of the police, a series of shocking evidence falsifications and procedural irregularities were staged. It was because Huang Ling was indescribable that he said angrily
1) The handling authority is illegal, and the approval procedures are unlawful.
2) Exceeding one's authority and abusing one's authority.
The prison party committee, forging state documents in the name of the factory party branch, colluding with the prison discipline inspection committee to frame a crime, and dismissing our policemen from public office in the name of an enterprise, concocted a so-called gathering of people to gamble under the operation of Shenwen Zhouna, in the fact that there were no supervision organs and public security organs to grasp the violations of law and discipline and regulations.
The prison discipline inspection committee forged three interrogation records and fingerprint signatures, all of which were forgedHubei Sanzhen Appraisal Institute, the fake appraisal report, Wang Yong, director of the Ministry of Justice, supervised the handling, admitted that it was not his fingerprints, the Ministry of Justice's petition Liu Division, also asked experts to read it, and Zeng Guogang, the reporter of the prison discipline inspection commission at the time, also admitted that the leader asked him to do it. ......
Article 35 of the Interim Regulations on State Civil Servants clearly stipulates that the administrative sanction given to a State civil servant shall be decided ...... by the appointment and removal organ or the administrative supervision organ respectively in accordance with the law.
The Law of the People's Republic of China on Governmental Sanctions for Public Employees also makes strict provisions, saying that the facts shall be clear, the evidence shall be conclusive, the characterization shall be accurate, the handling shall be appropriate, the procedures shall be lawful, and the formalities shall be complete.
Give governmental sanctions to public employees, adhere to the principle of party management of cadres, and make decisions through collective discussion;Persist in equality before the law, with the facts as the basis and the law as the measure, and the governmental sanctions given are commensurate with the nature, circumstances, and degree of harm of the violation;Persist in combining punishment with education, blending leniency with severity.
It can be seen that the dismissal of the police by the enterprise is never just a joke of "Chicken Si Chen", but more importantly, it highlights the corruption behind the funny, which is all eye-splitting and difficult to write.
Huang Ling, as a "senior petitioner", adheres to the principle of reverence for the law, unswerving, and devout to the faith, no matter how hard she tries, she just can't see justice beckoning to her!Undoubtedly, this is the sorrow of the rule of law and the sorrow of human nature.
Interpretation of the Supervision Law (45)] Six Ways for Supervision Organs to Perform Disposition Duties in Accordance with Law on the Basis of Supervision and Investigation Results (Article 6):
Where upon investigation, the Supervision Organs have no evidence to prove that the person being investigated has violated or committed a crime, they shall withdraw the case and notify the unit to which the person being investigated belongs.
Article 75 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that administrative organs shall establish and improve a supervision system for administrative punishments. The people at or above the county level shall regularly organize and carry out administrative law enforcement evaluations and assessments, strengthen supervision and inspection of administrative punishments, and standardize and safeguard the implementation of administrative punishments.
Administrative organs carrying out administrative punishments shall accept social oversight. Citizens, legal persons, or other organizations have the right to appeal or report the conduct of administrative organs imposing administrative punishments;Administrative organs shall earnestly review and discover that there are mistakes, they shall take the initiative to correct them.
Micro comment: In the face of Huang Ling's wrongful case, it has been 29 years. In the long 29 years, what hardships and hardships has Huang Ling experienced in life?Only if a person drinks water, he knows whether he is warm or cold.
In the context of comprehensively advancing the rule of law, Huang Ling's 29-year-old wrongful case has not movedThis is a deep topic that the rule of law itself needs to be addressed, and it is also a topic that public officials should think about.
How many 29 years are there in life?If you think about it, you will feel ashamed of your responsibility. A public servant is the "incarnate" of serving the people, but not an "outsider" who stays out of thingsIn the face of petitioners walking on the thorny road, as a "public servant", the beauty of human nature can be released. Only in this way will society be harmonious, the nation prosperous, and the people will live and work in peace and contentment.
It is worthy of the party, the root of diligent government;It is worthy of the people and the source of clean government. In the correction of errors in the Huang Ling case, the construction of the rule of law in Hubei Province needs to be vigorously promoted After all, it is a time when a 29-year-old wrongful case needs to be solved urgently!