The latest report from the American analytical agency Eurasia Group reveals a shocking reality: the reduction in US military aid has dealt a devastating blow to Ukraine. This is not just a war, but a destruction of Ukraine's military and economic base. The Eurasian Group noted that in the absence of adequate military assistance, Ukraine is falling into a sharp reduction in ** and financial support.
The report of the Eurasian Group analyzes this phenomenon in detail, noting that the cautious position of Western countries has led to a sharp reduction in military and economic support for Ukraine. This uncertainty has made the war increasingly difficult for Ukraine.
Biden**'s plans on Ukraine clearly do not have a clear direction, which makes the situation even more confusing. At this critical juncture, whether the United States wants Ukraine to regain territory first has become the focus of attention from the outside world. However, it is also a troubling question to see if the Ukrainian army has a clear ** objective, which also seems to be a vexing one.
Biden's lack of a complete plan for Ukraine has made Ukraine's strategy seem fragmented. The lack of clear goals has made U.S. aid obscure, and Ukraine has been at a loss in the face of Russian pressure. This state of disorientation has not only left Ukraine in a difficult position, but has also caused the international community to worry about its prospects.
The lack of U.S. aid is directly reflected in the strength of the Ukrainian army, which makes Ukraine almost incapable of fighting back on the battlefield. Ukraine cannot rely on only 31 M1A1 tanks to fight against the three tight lines of defense formed by the huge Russian army of 610,000. The Ukrainian army is powerless in the face of the large and advanced Russian army. With insufficient US aid, the counterattack power of the Ukrainian army is almost zero. In this case, Ukraine can only watch as Russia's superiority gradually expands.
Russia's dominance in terms of heavy ** continues to expand, making it seem that Putin has the initiative. The main force of the Russian regular army conducts intensive training on the second line, and in 2023, the Russian army will be expanded by 400,000 people. Putin's next move could be to seize the entire four referendum oblasts, attack Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, and even Kyiv again.
Putin's strategic goal is clear, he seeks to restore Russia's traditional sphere of influence and unify the Eastern Slavic regions. By interpreting Putin's actions to join Russia in 2023 from Peter the Great and referendums in four states, we can get a glimpse of Putin's ambitions and strategies. Russia's growing military power provides a strong guarantee for its dominance in the Ukrainian issue.
The actual strength of U.S. aid does not meet Ukraine's urgent needs on the battlefield. In the face of Russia's huge military power, the Ukrainian army cannot form a sufficient counterforce with only a small number of tanks and arms assistance. This puts Ukraine's military superiority in jeopardy, and it is in a predicament of being powerless.
Ukraine cannot fight Russia's huge army with only a small number of tanks, which makes it lack sufficient counterattack forces at the strategic level. The lack of US aid has led to the dilemma of the Ukrainian army in actual battles, unable to effectively counter the offensive of the Russian army. The lack of equipment and strength of the Ukrainian army makes it a serious military challenge and makes it difficult to launch a strong confrontation with Russia.
Ukraine's limited number of tanks is far from enough to counter the three tight lines of defense of Russia's 610,000-strong army. This asymmetrical power has left Ukraine in a situation where it cannot be solved when it comes to achieving an effective counterattack. In the face of a huge Russian army, the Ukrainian army cannot rely on a limited number of tanks alone to change the tide of the war.
Russia's growing advantage over Ukraine in terms of gravity makes it likely that Putin will continue to push forward with the operation. The strength of the Russian army has put Ukraine in an even more dangerous situation, and this asymmetrical balance of power has directly affected the development of the war.
Putin's military ambitions are becoming increasingly apparent, and the preparations of the Russian army are clearly directed towards seizing the entire four referendum oblasts, attacking Kharkov, Mykolaiv and other important goals. Putin's motives and strategic goals are aimed at restoring Russia's traditional spheres of influence and unifying the Eastern Slavic regions. This can be seen from his actions to compare Peter the Great and the referendum on the accession of four states to Russia, and the deep political and geostrategic considerations behind Putin's military action against Ukraine.
In the Battle of Mutter, Russia showed a high degree of tolerance for the Mut. Even in the face of the tragic situation of 40,000 killed and 20,000 wounded, there was a sense of joy at the loss in the country. This particular sentiment reflects the peculiar attitude of the Russian people to the war and does not seem to have affected their firm determination to fight.
Russia's traditional tolerance for ** comes from its splendid and rugged history. The trials of successive wars have shaped the indomitable character of the Russians, enabling them to fight to the end in the face of all difficulties on the battlefield. This iron-blooded tradition is one of the important reasons why Russia excelled in the war.
In the Battle of Mutter, Russia injected a touch of splendor into the battlefield by employing criminal criminals from the Wagner Group using a unique and compelling mercenary strategy. This choice may come as a surprise, but it also reflects Russia's unique strategy in terms of human resources. These criminal criminals showed extraordinary courage on the battlefield and won a series of battles for Russia.
Russia also fills the army's manpower needs by hiring foreign mercenaries. These mercenaries, mainly from Nepal, Central Asia and Africa, fought at relatively low salaries. However, they were only trained for a short time and were sent to the front when equipped, becoming a force to be reckoned with.
Many mercenaries survive only a few months on the battlefield and have a hard time receiving a pension when they die in battle. Such short-term employment relationships can affect the effectiveness of mercenaries on the battlefield and raise a range of ethical and legal issues. The differences within the Russian army are evident on the battlefield, with the presence of regular and attritional forces constituting a polarized war force.
The regular Russian army consists mainly of artillery, armor and guards. This army is highly trained, well-equipped, and has a high level of combat literacy. In war, they play an important role, responsible for the defense and offense of key areas. The survival rate of this type of soldier is relatively low, and the main purpose of their participation in combat is to carry out expendable tasks. The existence of this division has made Russia have different levels of combat power on the battlefield.
Russia's regular army makes up the elite of the military system. It consisted mainly of artillery, armor and guards, which had undergone a long period of rigorous training and were well equipped. Artillery demonstrated its strong fire coverage on the battlefield, armored units had an advantage in mobility and equipment, and the Guards were the backbone of the army. This regular army plays a decisive role on the battlefield and is responsible for defending the dignity of the country.
In stark contrast to the regular army, the identity of the attrition soldiers is not from Russia itself, but from foreign mercenaries. Zhao Rui, Xiaoqiang and others became representatives of this group, and they were sent to the battlefield to complete consumable tasks after only a short period of training. This special division of labor in warfare makes the attrition soldiers become "cannon fodder" in the army, buying time, information and advantageous positions for the regular army.
Russia's superiority in large-scale warfare is manifested in its ability to quickly and massively find cheap infantry and artillery shells. This ability is like owning a massive war machine that can be continuously thrown into battle. Cheap infantry and artillery shells do not mean a sacrifice in quality, on the contrary, it provides Russia with a flexible force configuration and fire support, forming a kind of progressive military advantage.