Technology meets reading As a cute new writer,The first time Da Lang used AI to rewrite,It's because you want to reduce the 800-word small composition to 500 words and then generate a small **,A lazy plus is exploring various functions of the software,I spent some points to use this legendary AI.。 Here's how it works:
Part 1: Hello everyone, I am a serious and serious Du Dalang, and the content I bring to you today is "I am not confused at twenty, what do you think of the movie "Article 20"? "The movie Spring Festival file is about to come to an end, and this year's New Year film can be described as wonderful, life, law, passion, reversal, and plot excitement and diversity, making the whole Spring Festival atmosphere hot and hot. Zhang Yimou's "Article 20" has continued to rise in popularity with the broadcast, and the word of mouth has counterattacked, and has been praised by many official media. Dalang, I'm also here to join in the fun. The theme of the film is "Article 20" – justifiable self-defense and excessive self-defense and their criminal liabilityThe AI is rewritten as: "Today we are going to talk about Article 20 of a thought-provoking movie, which revolves around Article 20, ** the issue of legitimate defense and excessive defense, and its criminal liability," he said
Part II: In the movie, the son of the male protagonist prosecutor encountered a school bully bullying incident on campus, and when he saw injustice, he roared and knocked the bridge of the school bully's nose crooked. Zhang Guisheng, a bus driver, saw that the female passenger was bullied by several men and acted angrily, but because he did not do it lightly, he smashed the person into serious injury, and was finally found guilty of intentional injury and imprisoned. AI rewritten as: "In the movie, the son of the male protagonist prosecutor saw the school bullying incident on campus, and he bravely stood up to resist, but was almost detained because of excessive defense, and another bus driver, Zhang Guisheng, also helped after seeing the female passenger being bullied by the man, but he was seriously injured and imprisoned because he was too heavy."
Part 3: This reminds me of a sentence I often hear people say: "If you don't read the Water Margin, you don't read the Three Kingdoms." When I was a child, I listened to the brothers and sisters around me happily say that the star they chased when they were children was an old boy, very righteous, handsome and handsome, and liked it very much. Slowly understood the meaning of this sentence, it seems that young people are strong-blooded and impulsive, and they are easy to be impulsive, and they have learned from "Water Margin", learning from the heroes in it, and roaring when they see injustice, they will shoot when they should ,......The original intention is good and good, but in the end it leads to bad consequences. AI rewritten as: "This reminds me of the sentence, don't read the Water Margin, don't read the Three Kingdoms when you don't read it, young people are easy to be impulsive when they read the Water Margin, and they pull out a knife to help when they see injustice, but it often leads to bad consequences,".
Part 4:To get back to the point, the starting point of the movie is "law, you can't bow to lawlessness". Justice should have its own confidence, and when people are brave and courageous, they have the confidence to obtain the light that guards justice - "Article 20"! There is a plot later in the movie, where the male protagonist's son asks his father, "Dad, if I see someone bullying others in the future, can I still take action?" This question was a question for everyone many years ago, "Should I help the grandmother who fell to the ground?" ”
As a twenty-year-old who is not confused, after reading it, I am also thinking, "Should I be brave in my actions?"
Should! "But at the same time, I also have to do a good job of legitimate defense, in addition to the meaning of the legal provisions, can the legitimate defense here be understood from the perspective of public order and good customs to mean that while upholding justice, we must also protect ourselves; While defending against the illegal encroachment of others, we should also pay attention to choosing a method that is more beneficial to ourselves?
Adhere to the bottom line of kindness, insist on righteousness and courage, and at the same time be smart and calm, protect yourself, and choose better ways and methods, after all, life is not a movie.
AI rewritten as: "The movie tells us that the law cannot bow to lawlessness, justice requires courage, but it also needs confidence, we must protect ourselves while acting bravely, in real life, in the face of similar situations, how should we choose, whether we should help, this question has confused many people, but I think we should stand up bravely, but we must also choose the right way rationally, this movie has given us a lot of inspiration, I hope we can protect ourselves at the same time, can also stick to the bottom line of justice and kindness, let's think together about how to do this in life. ”
What do you think of the change? It seems that Da Lang himself wrote more verbosely?
Recently, the controversy about SOLA has spread all over the Internet, and there are different opinions on whether to resist or accept, with Musk saying that "GG Humans" and Zhou Hongyi saying that "AI's ability to understand the real world has reached a new level......”Then I saw an interesting comment on the Internet, "When will AI rescue the 'pen sticks' of various units"?
Readers, do you think that the pen can be liberated haha?