Judgment and reasoning is an independent module in the civil service test paper, accounting for 35-40 questions, relatively speaking, it is still relatively important, the question type of this module is characterized by many knowledge points, fragmented, and has a certain degree of difficulty. Most students may have poor acceptance and fear of difficulties, but it is easy to get points for judging and reasoning after overcoming difficulties and mastering knowledge points. Judgment reasoning is divided into four major sections: graphical reasoning, definition judgment, analogical reasoning, and logical judgment.
Analogical reasoning appears in the test papers of the national and provincial examinations with an average of 10 questions, because it has the characteristics of fewer words and simple question stems, so it is relatively easy to do, and most students will do the questions faster, so you can flexibly arrange the time to do the questions, you can do this part first after getting the paper, or you can do it at the end while painting the answer sheet. However, analogical reasoning needs to be combined with a certain amount of common sense to solve problems, and common sense needs to be accumulated, so this type of question also has its own difficulty. The judgment of the relationship between terms by analogical reasoning can be divided into four categories: extension relationship, connotation relationship, grammatical relationship, and semantic relationship. Here is an example of an extension relationship to share dry goods.
Extension relationship refers to the scope of a word starting from its own concept, such as people, its conceptual scope is very large, generally speaking, the simpler the concept, the larger the scope, such as people, food, tools. There will be two or even three words in analogical reasoning, and at this time, the test is whether there is overlap, intersection and conflict between words and the conceptual range between words, and the relationship and test points reflected in different situations are also different.
The scope of the concepts coincides, which means that the two concepts are completely equivalent, which we call the congruence relationship. For example: Tomatoes: tomatoes; Chocolate: Zhu.
The scope of the concept is intersecting, which means that two concepts have both common parts and independent parts, which we call the intersection relationship. For example: Man: Singer; Principal:
Conflicting conceptual scopes mean that the scope of two concepts is completely different, which we call the total difference relationship. For example: Black: White; Brush:
The scope of the concept is divided into sizes, and the concept of a small scope is within the concept of a large range, which we call the inclusion relationship. For example: Person: Woman: Mom; Container: Cup: Coffee.
Here is just a brief introduction to the first-level test points in the extension relationship, which is a preliminary understanding of the conceptual scope of words, but some of the first-level test points can be refined under the second-level test points, which is a deeper understanding of the extension relationship between words, which requires more detailed analysis.