Introduction:
After a night of silence, the situation in the Middle East has changed dramatically. A "people's war" against the US ** team is being waged nationwide and in full swing. According to a new report from the US Army Center Command, an unmanned aircraft carried out an airstrike on a base in Jordan, killing 3 Americans and injuring 34. At the same time, the Iranian side claimed that anti-American forces, mainly Iraqi militias, had attacked Syria and five American bases in Iraq. The move was seen as a counter-attack to the Biden administration's support for Israel in Gaza. This attack means that a "people's war" against the US ** team is sweeping the entire Middle East region. As the U.S. Department of Defense issued its first official public apology for the loss of life caused by the U.S. ** team in this terrorist attack, this incident has also attracted a lot of attention. Previously, militaries in the Middle East, in order to maintain their national and regional influence, generally chose to hide their secrets to solve the deaths of these personnel. This shift has led to reflection and reflection on the status and strategy of the US team in the Middle East.
The attack on the U.S. Air Force base and the U.S. Department of Defense concealing the truth.
In the past, most of the U.S. troops in the Middle East were injured during operations and patrols, rather than being attacked by military bases. In this way, a U.S. base can be considered a very safe area. However, due to Iran's rocket attack on the US ** base in 2020, there are already cracks in the position of the US ** team in the Middle East. The position of the US Department of Defense in the Middle East has always been high, and for this reason, the US Department of Defense has been using various methods to cover up the number of deaths of personnel. Although there has been recent news of the death of more than 40 Americans, this decision has been pressured by the main war faction in China. This death toll is likely to cause discontent among the American population, prompting ** to add more troops and take more action. But as U.S. power declines, the Department of Defense finds itself in an even greater dilemma. A return to the Middle East may not be a wise choice, as many commercial vessels have been attacked by the more than a month-long stalemate between the United States and the Houthis, as well as the failure to adequately stop Houthi missile attacks. Such a failure is a wake-up call to the world: even if the United States decides to relaunch a campaign, there is no guarantee of success.
Public Comment & ** Reaction.
U.S. ** Biden and voices from all walks of life in the United States have responded forcefully to this terrorist attack. While the American public continues to demand a blow to Iran, Biden has also pledged to "respond." Against this backdrop, if Biden had announced additional troop deployments to the Middle East and intensified strikes against Iranian forces, he would not have faced much political resistance. However, it is a big question whether the American team can really believe that they will win. Given that the U.S. is currently in a stalemate with the Houthis, and Iran's military is relatively strong, it will be difficult for the U.S. to go to war with Iran. In the Middle East, the US team is bound to face a "people's war."
All in all, the recent attacks on US bases in the Middle East have caused a lot of discussion about the image and strategy of the United States in the Middle East. In the past, the U.S. Department of Defense has made great efforts to maintain the U.S. forces in the Middle East, but when the situation in the region changes, it may have to rethink its approach to personnel situations. However, given the relative decline in US power, it is not wise to revert to military activity in the Middle East. The situation in the Middle East is still difficult, but this attack will have a profound impact on the policymaking of the US team and the Biden administration.