The CBA championship favorite was dissatisfied with the referee s blowing penalty, gave up the game

Mondo Sports Updated on 2024-02-04

cbaIn the twenty-third round of the regular season, the Guangdong team faced the Guangsha team at home, which was a high-profile focus battle. After four quarters of fierce confrontation between the two sides, the Guangdong team completed the reversal after falling behind by 18 points at one point, and finally defeated the Guangsha team by 106-95 by 11 points. The result of this game allowed the Guangdong team to win 3 consecutive victories and rank fourth in the standings with a record of 18 wins and 5 losses; The Guangsha team suffered two consecutive defeats and ranked fifth in the standings with a record of 16 wins and 7 losses. However, this match has some embarrassing things happening for both sides.

In the third quarter of the game, the head coach of the Guangsha teamWang BoShowing an intent, he was unhappy with the referee's blowing and decided to deliberately lose the match. At that time,Wang BoAll the main players and foreign players were removed, and five substitutes were sent to play. This kind of move, incbaVery rare on the field. This decision caused dissatisfaction and controversy among the Guangsha team. The players raised the referee's decision to **, whileWang BoHe also frequently argues with referees. In the end, the referee insisted on his decisionWang BoAngrily made a five-up-five-down rotation to keep five substitutes on the line. In the end, the Guangsha team lost to the Guangdong team by 11 points.

At the beginning of the game, the Guangdong team had interruptions and mistakes on the offensive end, giving the Guangsha team a chance to counterattack. The Guangsha team seized the opportunity, relying onSun MinghuiofThree-point shothit and led the Guangdong team by 10 points at 25-15. Subsequently, the Guangdong team gradually recovered after personnel adjustments, and trailed the Guangsha team by 5 points at 23-28 at the end of the first quarter.

In the second quarter of the game, the Guangsha team used the combination of inside and outside to show the offensive power of multi-point flowering. At one point, they led Guangdong by 18 points, 58-40. However, inWatersUnder the leadership, the Guangdong team played a wave of scoring climaxes and narrowed the point difference. At the end of the first half, Guangdong trailed Guangsha by 12 points, 51-63.

After the start of the second half, the Guangdong team, under the leadership of Weems, quickly launched a wave of 18-2 offensive and overtook the score in one fell swoop. However, at a critical moment,Wang QingMing's defensive moves against Weems caused controversy. The referee confirmedWang QingMing fouled, but the Guangsha team expressed dissatisfaction with the penalty and made a ** to the referee. Wang BoExpressing dissatisfaction, it was immediately decided to send five substitutes to continue the game. In the end, the Guangsha team lost to the Guangdong team with such a personnel arrangement.

After the game,Wang BoIn an interview, he did not comment on the situation of the game, but wished the Guangdong teamYi JianlianLife is getting better and better after retirement. Then, he turned and walked away from the interview. Such an act has sparked widespread controversy and criticism.

Basketball** People Inspector Zhao thinksWang BoThis "silent **" is lackingSportsManifestation of the spirit. In the article, he wrote: "Such a wonderful duel came to an abrupt end, and now all the viewers are already excited, and I want to ask you what you think."Wang BoThis kind of 'silent **' of guidance is very rare, and I think it is lackingSportsSpiritual. ”Su QunIt is believed that the result of this game is caused by the difference in the understanding of the rules between the two sides. In any case, the anticlimactic nature of this game is regrettable.

This game happened forcbaThe development is unfavorable. The controversy between the two sides has left people with deep regret and dissatisfaction. The referee's decision and the coach's intention became the focus. This kind of event is forBasketballThe fairness of the sport and respect for the rules both constitute shocks, causing confusion and confusion to spectators and fans.

IncbaIn the game, the impartiality of the referee and the coach's code of conduct are very important. Controversy is inevitable in the game, but both sides should express their dissatisfaction through reasonable channels rather than abandoning the game or taking extreme actions. Only by abiding by the rules and respecting the spirit of competition can we make itcbaThe league is developing in a healthier and more orderly manner.

All in all, the result of this match and the controversy that took place were impressive. We should reflect and think about the problems in it in order to be able to push forwardcbaFurther development and enhancement of the league. By strengthening referee training, improving the quality and professional ethics of coaches, I believecbaLeagues can become more fair, regulated and respected.

Related Pages