Dong Yuhui s team was accused of plagiarism, and he was suspected of swiping a 500 yuan gift to calm

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-02-01

A few days ago, the blogger "Yang Fan Talks about Art", which has more than 2.3 million fans, released ** saying that he plagiarized his own copywriting on a large scale in the live broadcast room with HuiIts anchor's explanation** overlaps with its own content by 90%., when selling goods, commercial use and slicing to make a short ** is plagiarism.

Regarding the "accusation", the blogger "Yang Fan Talks about Art" listed three similarities with his own introduction to Michelangelo in the early years when Dong Dong, the anchor of Hui's peer anchor, explained Michelangelo.

The first is the part of Michelangelo's master-apprentice relationship, the blogger said that the other party's content, structure, and terminology are almost exactly the same as his own, and he was the first to explain the three masters of the Renaissance on the domestic network platform according to the Chinese master-apprentice relationship model, and the relationship chart was also sorted out by searching for more than ten documents.

Secondly, the Faunus sculpture ** shown by Dong Dong, the anchor Dong Dong who walked with Hui, to netizens in the live broadcast room** is not the original picture of the real thing, but a screenshot of his own **. Originally, the sculpture no longer exists, and the picture is an example of the sculpture I found.

Regarding ***'s remarks, Dong Dong, the anchor who traveled with Hui, said during the live broadcastWhen explaining art, you may use some teachers' works, but there is no offense, and you can communicate in time if you have any questions, suspected of responding to a plagiarism incident.

Subsequently, Yang Fan posted ** again, saying that after his ** was issued, he received "sarcasm" from many fans. He said, "The content overlaps 90%, and it is commercialized when selling goods, which is not plagiarism", "I will be scolded for plagiarism".

Dong Dong also said that the message to "Yang Fan talks about art" was deleted, and "Yang Fan talks about art" said that it was not deleted, and he was also abused by the other party's fansThe other party also swiped a 500 yuan gift during his live broadcast, and he suspected that he wanted to turn things over。"Yang Fan talks about art" said that he can not be held accountable for commercial plagiarism, but he hopes that the other party will declare and quote **.

Nowadays, some anchors are crazy and no one cares, and some anchors are on the hot search because of a sentence that has been overinterpreted. There are many so-called popular people, for head anchors like Dong Yuhui and Brother Xiao Yang, there are many people who rely on them to survive, some rely on "** slices" to live, some earn commissions by selling the same products, and some record the screen every day, hoping to gain something. As for the plagiarism problem reflected by the blogger this time, whether there is a suspicion of touching porcelain, this cannot be generalized, everyone has their own opinion.

But the plagiarism of the anchor's copywriting is no longer news, and Dong Yuhui has had "infighting" within him before. The copywriter brother directly Aite Dong Yuhui accused him of being in vain, and the real talent is the copywriter brother behind him.

Actually,If an anchor like Dong Yuhui who uses "art" as a selling point wants to maintain a large number of continuous output, it is impossible to rely on personal cultural accumulation alone, and there must be a team behind it to serve it。For anchors, the requirements for their copywriting must be relatively high, but for the employees who produce copywriting, it may not be, after all, it is not to show their faces, just to eat, and commuting to work at the point is the "king", so it is very likely to plagiarize.

Judging from this incident, the repetition rate of Dong Yuhui's team's overturned "ancient text" copywriting is relatively high, because the historical event itself is already "conventional", and he is not a creative thing. ButPlagiarism is an act, no matter who or when, but it will not be easy to get involved. I also hope that the anchors can take this as a warning and avoid overturning.

Related Pages