In today's drone market, DJI's M**ic series has always been loved by consumers for its excellent performance and excellent shooting capabilities. In particular, the two models, M**IC 3 Pro and M**IC 3, each with their own unique advantages and characteristics, have become the focus of attention of aerial photography enthusiasts. This article will compare the differences between these two drones in terms of lens, image quality, battery life, etc., in detail to help you better understand them.
1. Comparison of lens configurations.
The M**IC 3 Pro has undergone a significant upgrade in the lens configuration, employing a triple camera system. One of the most striking is the new 70mm-equivalent mid-telephoto camera, which supports 3x optical zoom and has an f 28 apertures and up to 48 million pixel resolution. This configuration not only brings more flexibility to shooting, but also allows for more detailed capture.
In contrast, the M**IC 3 features a dual-camera system, consisting of a Hasselblad lens and a telephoto lens. While this configuration is already quite good in the field of aerial photography, it is still slightly inferior to the M**ic 3 Pro in terms of lens diversity and shooting capabilities.
2. Comparison of telephoto image quality.
In terms of telephoto image quality, the M**ic 3 Pro also performs well. The telephoto camera has a 166mm-equivalent focal length and supports 7x optical zoom and 28x hybrid zoom. The aperture size is f 34. The number of pixels has reached 12 million, and the maximum resolution can support 4K 60 frames. This allows the M**IC 3 Pro to maintain crisp and stable image quality when shooting long-range targets.
The M**IC 3's telephoto camera has a 162mm-equivalent focal length and also supports 7x optical zoom and 28x hybrid zoom. However, its aperture size is f 44. The pixel is 12 million, and the maximum resolution supports 4K 50 frames. Although these parameters are similar to those of the M**ic 3 Pro, the image quality of the M**ic 3 Pro is still slightly better in actual shooting.
3. Comparison of aerial photography quality.
In terms of aerial image quality, both the M**IC 3 Pro and M**IC 3 deliver extremely high levels. However, thanks to the advantages of the M**ic 3 Pro in terms of lenses and pixels, it is better in terms of shooting detail and color reproduction. At the same time, the M**ic 3 Pro also supports a higher dynamic range and a wider color gamut, which makes it more comfortable when shooting high-contrast scenes and richly colored images.
Fourth, ** Comparison of shooting capabilities.
In terms of shooting, the highest pixels of the M**ic 3 Pro reach 48 million, which allows it to shoot more detailed and rich. The highest pixel of the M**IC 3 is 20 million, although this pixel is enough for most aerial photography needs, but there is still a certain gap compared with the M**IC 3 Pro.
5. Comparison of battery life.
In terms of battery life, both the M**IC 3 Pro and M**IC 3 have shown good strength. According to official data, the standard battery life of the M**IC 3 Pro is 43 minutes, while the standard battery life of the M**IC 3 is 46 minutes. Although the M**IC 3 is slightly better in terms of battery life, the difference between the two is not obvious, and the impact on practical use is limited.
6. Positioning and summary.
In summary, the M**ic 3 Pro has successfully positioned itself as a high-end flagship model for aerial photography with its triple camera system, excellent telephoto image quality, and superior aerial photography capabilities. The M**IC 3 occupies a place in the aerial photography market with its dual camera system, excellent aerial photography performance and long battery life. For consumers, which model to choose mainly depends on their actual needs and budget. If you're looking for higher shooting quality and more shooting features, then the M**IC 3 Pro is undoubtedly a better choice; And if you have the basic needs of aerial photography and want to save some budget, then the m**ic 3 is also a very good choice.