On the glorious night of CBA, Beijing Beikong won six games in a row
Background: On the evening of January 28, Beijing time, in the 36th round of the CBA League, Beijing Beikong narrowly defeated Zhejiang Guangsha 114:112 away, successfully winning six consecutive games and consolidating their solid position in the top eight in the league. It was a fierce game, especially in the final moments, when a key controversy not only ignited the enthusiasm of the fans, but also aroused doubts about the referee's blowing penalty.
Counterattack: Both teams showed excellent performances throughout the game, while Beijing Beikong completed a stunning comeback in the final stages of the game, and the 13-point comeback put the focus on this team. However, there was a high-profile controversy in the last two minutes of the game, and a confrontation about Zhang Fanwei's feet became the focus of heated discussions after the game.
Controversial scenes: At a critical moment in the game, Zhang Fanwei's foot caused a lot of controversy. In the process of holding the ball, after colliding with the opponent's foot, Zhang Fan handed over the ball due to injury. This gave Zhejiang Guangsha a chance, and they took advantage of the situation to steal and counterattack, and Zhao Yanhao threw in a three-pointer to narrow the gap to 3 points. After reviewing the video, the referee insisted that there was no physical foul and did not make up for Duan Liqian's foul. However, the slow motion clearly showed that Duan Liqian kicked Zhang Fan's foot, which was obviously a foul action.
The referee's omission caused dissatisfaction: This omission caused dissatisfaction with Zhou He, a commentator of Beijing Holdings. He bluntly said that Duan Liqian obviously flew the shovel and did not blow the foul, which made people question whether the referee was biased towards Guangsha. This has also sparked discussions about the referee's subjective decision, especially at the critical moment in the final part of the game, when the referee's decision directly affects the trend of the game.
Selective blindness and the situation on the court: Zhou He mentioned "selective blindness" in his post, vividly expressing his dissatisfaction with the referee's subjective decision. He said that the best response to this situation is to throw the ball in. This can't help but remind people of the technical foul that Min Lulei ate in the first quarter of the game due to the referee's decision. Missed decisions or mistakes by referees seem to have become a non-negligible part of the pitch, and the performance of the players in this situation has undoubtedly become the focus of attention.
Win sealed: In the last minute of the game, Beijing Beikong relied on the advantage of rebounding in the front court to get continuous offensive opportunities. Felder sealed the win with a three-pointer in the final 37 seconds. Zhou He mentioned in his post that "in the face of selective blindness, the best response is to throw the ball in", which may represent a response to referee errors within the team.
The referee blows the penalty, are you satisfied? : Referee blowing has always been a topic of concern in basketball, especially at critical moments. Whether this omission had a substantial impact on the game is worth in-depth discussion. Are you satisfied with the referee's blow? Feel free to leave a comment and share your views.
Analysis summary: Regardless of the referee's decision, Beijing Beikong finally won a series of victories with excellent performance. However, the importance of referees in the game cannot be overlooked, especially when it comes to decisions at crucial moments. This also reminds us that the impartiality and accuracy of referees in sports competitions are crucial, and penalties need to be judged in a more scientific and impartial way to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the game. It is expected that the CBA will be able to improve the referee system in future competitions and improve the quality and enjoyment of the games.