With the rapid development of modern science and technology and the popularization of higher education, postgraduate education has become one of the main ways to train high-level professionals. One of the core aspects of graduate education is to complete a high-quality graduation**, which is the ultimate test of the results of graduate training.
However, with the advent of the information age, the wide application of network resources has also brought some new problems to the academic community, one of which is the first to check for duplicates. Due to the high degree of information sharing, the problem of academic plagiarism is becoming more and more serious, in order to protect academic integrity and improve the quality, colleges and universities generally use the plagiarism checking system to check the plagiarism of students.
So, for graduate students, will the proportion of duplicate checks affect the normal defense? This is a matter of great concern. This article will discuss this issue from the aspects of the principle of the plagiarism checking system, the influence of the plagiarism checking ratio and the defense requirements.
First of all, the plagiarism checking system is a tool that uses computer technology to detect whether there is duplicate content in **. It works by comparing ** with known documents to find parts that are similar above the set threshold, so as to determine whether there is plagiarism. Common plagiarism checking systems include CNKI, **free, etc. These systems are widely used in academia, and their plagiarism ratios are usually expressed as percentages, representing the proportion of the total content in ** that are similar to existing literature.
Secondly, the proportion of duplicate checks has a certain impact on whether the ** defense can be carried out normally. Generally speaking, colleges and universities have different requirements for ** duplicate checking, but they usually require that the proportion of duplicate checking should not exceed 15% 20%. This is mainly to ensure that the student's ** has a certain originality and avoid over-reliance on the existing achievements of others. If the duplicate check ratio exceeds the threshold set by the school, it may cause the defense committee to question it, further review the student's **, and may even affect the normal progress of the defense.
However, the duplicate check ratio alone cannot be used as the only criterion for judging **quality. After all, literature review and citing the work of others are indispensable parts of academic writing, and moderate citation is not plagiarism. Therefore, when judging whether the first can be defended normally, in addition to the proportion of duplicate checking, it is also necessary to comprehensively consider the overall quality of the first, the innovation of the research, the reliability of the data, and the reasonableness of the conclusion.