Is Lifeng a fake penmanship?
Hello dear friends, and welcome to the Stop Water Cottage. Today, let's talk about penmanship. Because some book friends asked me if Lifeng was right? Many people say that Lifeng is also a fake penmanship, or it is different from the ancient penmanship, is it okay or not? I'm going to talk to you today.
For example, what is written here today is the statue of Dune City, which is a calligraphy from the Northern Qi Dynasty and a tablet set at that time. Why do you want to use this to talk to everyone? In fact, when it comes to the problem of penmanship, penmanship is to use the simpler and simpler brushwork to do, so that the strokes can be done, and there is no need to worry about what kind of action is the right one. Actually, I think it's right to be able to do it simply, and the fewer moves you have, the better.
For example, this horizontal down, just like this, when you go, you will come up and go straight forward, because it still contains the feeling of Lishu at that time. In this way, one stroke down, the same down, lifted, lifted, pressed down, walked, lifted, all are the most simple brushwork. Therefore, if you use the current penmanship, it is definitely not wrong to write with a very simple penmanship. This is the case here, and after this continues, it will pass, and this time the brushwork of the ancients is indeed like this, relatively simple.
Nowadays, people learn because teaching children is the same, and teaching adults is the same, why are there so many movements? Because when I first started learning, I was not so handy with the pen, for example, there will always be strokes when writing, and the strokes written are many different from the original post. So these teachers will find a way to use some actions to make you write more accurately, and the faster strokes will be similar to the original post, so there will be a lot of actions.
Are you saying it's wrong? I don't dare to say it, it seems to be a little different from the ancient brushwork, for example, this one will pass, come down, come down, just mention it.
If you still stretch to the two horizontal lines just written, now some people use vertical edges, for example, this horizontal is cut down like this, stand up and walk over, press down, walk, the general situation is like this. Is it wrong to say it? Is it really wrong? It doesn't seem to be big. Yes, is it right to say it? Not right either.
In fact, according to this extension, it should be like this, cut down, press down and go, back, there is not so much action, not even the return wind, cut down and go, press down and go back. Sometimes there is no return, just like some of Chu Suiliang's horizontal paintings, that is, cut away, press down and pull it down, and there is no obvious back.
Actually, if this is the case, I think it should be a little right, but now some calligraphy teaching will also have some actions, and I don't think I dare to say it personally, because there are many people who have learned it from this way. For example, this apostrophe was cut down like this and skimmed out, and now it may be skimmed, is this wrong? I can't say that this is wrong, and I think it's okay.
Cut away, this ancient penmanship, go down to mention, like these are the fonts in the evolution of the official book, seal script to regular script at that time, has been as concise as possible, everyone is benevolent, the wise see the wisdom, I don't judge, but if you can do it with a simple stroke, of course, it will be better to use a stroke to do it.
That's all for today, dear friends, goodbye friends.