The loss of the Ukrainian army in the battle of Avdeyevka and the forced rapid withdrawal is not only a strategic defeat, but also a tactical blow to the failure of the control of the troops. According to the Russian side, at the time of the rout, the Ukrainian army was actually unable to recover the lost ground and could only passively accept the retreat order. This painful lesson underscores the critical importance of U.S. aid to Ukraine, not just about equipment and supplies, but also about morale and inner support.
Expansion: The rout in Avdeyevka has dealt a blow to the Ukrainian army and damaged morale. Without timely assistance from the United States, the Ukrainian army is in a passive position and faces battlefield challenges. The delay in aid is not only related to materials, but also affects the morale and faith of the military. The defeat of the Ukrainian army is a warning of the significant impact of aid on military operations.
Ukraine** Zelensky also agreed with the criticality of US aid, and he frankly said that if it loses US support, Ukraine will fall into an irreparable predicament. It is worth noting that Zelensky's rejection of "Plan B" sent a helpless message to the outside world - Ukraine lacks temporary countermeasures, and once aid is interrupted, there will be no way back.
Expanding: Zelensky's remarks reveal Ukraine's military dependence on U.S. aid. His words conveyed concern about aid disruptions and a desperate anticipation of the future. At a time when the military is in turmoil, Zelensky's statement has attracted the attention of the outside world and also highlights the needs of the current situation of the Ukrainian army.
Ukraine's admission that Zelensky does not have a "plan B" shows its dilemma in the political and military game. In the face of the Ukrainian people's call for peace talks, Zelensky can only hope for Western assistance, because this is not only to safeguard Ukraine's territorial integrity, but also the key to maintaining his political career and power base.
Expanding: The absence of Zelensky's "Plan B" exposes his isolation and powerlessness in the current situation. Despite calls for peace talks in Ukraine, Zelensky has to rely on Western support in order to maintain an advantage on the battlefield. His dilemma is not only about political decision-making, but also about the interweaving of personal destiny with the future of the country.
Despite Ukraine's desire for Western help, history has also shown that aid is not the solution to the underlying problem. Although the large-scale support and arms aid of the United States and other countries in the past have increased Ukraine's combat strength to a certain extent, they have still failed to change Ukraine's predicament in the conflict. The Republican Party's negative attitude towards aid reflects the growing exhaustion of the American people, which continues to hamper the aid approval process.
Expanding: Ukraine has high hopes for Western aid, but aid will not solve the root causes. Years of aid have failed to make a decisive breakthrough for Ukraine, which has also led to frequent delays in the aid process. The Republican Party's delay in approving the aid bill highlights the practical difficulties of the aid dilemma.
Against the backdrop of Zelenskyy's acknowledgment of Ukraine's dependence on Western support, we can't help but ponder the question: can aid really solve the challenges facing Ukraine? History has taught us that aid, while important, is not the only way forward. Ukraine needs not only the support of external resources, but also the promotion of internal reforms to strengthen the country's overall strength and resilience. As an independent country, Ukraine should review its political, economic and military systems and find a new path for independent development. Only in this way can we truly get out of the current predicament and achieve long-term peace and stability in the country.