Opening: The science and technology industry is like a battlefield, and the first "On Protracted War" is not only the strategic guidance of the War of Resistance Against Japan, but also contains the wisdom of winning in today's scientific and technological competition. In 2023, we will overcome difficulties and enter a more challenging 2024, let us re-examine "On Protracted War", dig into the essence of strategic thinking, and explore the way to survive in the fierce competition.
Part 1: Key Elements of Strategic Thinking: The emphasis on "strategic focus" is the cornerstone of success, and it's just as critical in today's tech competition.
Recap: Technology companies compete like a war situation, and we can't simply misinterpret "strategic determination" as a dead end, nor can we try to compromise. ** The "roundabout" mentioned becomes the solution, just like the flexibility and innovation in the field of technology, rather than blind obsession or compromise. In the complex market environment, the essence of strategic determination is to flexibly respond to the twists and turns in the tactical process under the premise that the final goal remains unchanged.
Part 2: The Essence of Roundabout TacticsThe core of the article: Understand the true meaning of "detour", not misinterpret it as a dead end or compromise. In the field of science and technology, flexibility and innovation are the only way to achieve long-term goals.
Recap: We can't simply see "detours" as compromises, nor can we mistake flexibility for a loss of direction. Technology companies need to remain strategically focused in the face of market changes while being agile in their specific tactics. It's like a long-distance race, you can't just sprint, but you have to control the pace, accept twists and turns, and finally achieve the minimum input and the highest output.
Part 3: The Value of Long-termismThe core of the article: Under the premise of strategic determination, implement "long-termism", stick to the established goals, and be patient with the development of things.
Recap: The "long-termism" mentioned has also profound implications for tech companies. While adhering to the strategic focus, the company should anchor the established goals and advance step by step in a down-to-earth manner. In the process of implementation, be flexible, accept twists and turns, and be willing to give time and wait to achieve your goals.
Part 4: The Application of Dialectics in Science and Technology CompetitionThe core of the article: Using dialectics to look at science and technology competition, we should not only see the appearance, but also gain insight into the essence of things, and the contradictory relationship between the positive and negative aspects.
Recap: In the competition of technology companies, we must not only see the superficial phenomenon, but also deeply understand the essence of things. As dialectics says, things are made up of positive and negative aspects, and under certain circumstances, these two aspects can be transformed into each other to promote the overall development of things. For example, a company may be large on the surface, but it lacks core competitiveness in essence, and this "appearance essence" analysis is the key to the strategic decision of a technology company.
Conclusion: Looking back on the wisdom of "On Protracted War", we can also find valuable experience in the competition of science and technology. While maintaining strategic focus, tech companies need to understand the essence of roundabouts, adhere to long-termism, and look at problems with a dialectical way of thinking. Only in this way can we achieve the final victory in the competition. In reality, companies need to constantly adapt to market changes and remain nimble, but not lose sight of their end-game goals. The strategic thinking advocated is not only applicable to historical wars, but also provides profound inspiration for the development of today's technology companies.
Views and suggestions: In the face of fierce competition, technology companies should adhere to strategic focus, flexibly use roundabout tactics, implement long-termism, and use dialectics to look at problems. At the same time, it is necessary to deeply understand the essence of things, not be confused by superficial phenomena, and make wise decisions. While maintaining innovation and flexibility, companies need to have a clear end-game goal, not be distracted by short-term fluctuations, and pursue lasting competitiveness.
In the competition of technology, do you think it is more important to stick to strategic focus or be flexible? Feel free to leave a comment to share your thoughts.