The "iron head" who relied on rights protection to get out of the circle was banned by the whole network, and today we will analyze and analyze the underlying logic of things like "rights protection", why the iron head was banned, let's discuss it together.
Uncle Wen knew that the person Tietou was actually very late, it was one day in June 2023, when Uncle Wen was in the office, a colleague brought a mobile phone to Uncle Wen and showed Uncle Wen a "iron-headed" rights protection **, this is the first time I saw him**, I saw him holding the code in one hand, pointing to the sky and the earth with the other, angrily scolding the business, at that time, I was amazed by his momentum when defending his rights, ** can present this fierce confrontation effect, and it naturally feels "very happy" on the Internet, after all, no matter what the matter is, The posture is there, I always feel that there is a melon to eat, just like watching a stunt show, I always feel that the car that wears the fire ring is going to overturn, and I am also waiting for the iron head to be beaten by the unscrupulous businessman, maybe the iron head also wants this effect, but in fact, after so many periods, I haven't seen the iron head beaten, so I can only say that the unscrupulous merchants did not give the iron head a chance.
But after closing the **, a colleague still inadvertently popped out a sentence, "Why is it a bit like a professional anti-counterfeiter?" ”
To be honest, at first glance it looks a bit similar, but in fact, the traffic brought by this fierce conflict has far exceeded the benefits that professional anti-counterfeiters can bring.
Whether it is a professional anti-counterfeiter, or a rights defender, or a market supervision department, in fact, people in our journalist industry, especially for people's livelihood investigative reporters, have too much contact.
In today's developed world, short news not only replaces the entertainment function of television, but also partially replaces the third-party function of news reporters.
About ten years ago, there was a large number of requests for help every day, hoping that reporters could help defend their rights**, and at that time it was also the first period of people's livelihood news, and the people fully trusted it. Now everyone can go into battle with their mobile phones**, and the communication power is not worse than the traditional **, and even far surpasses, so who is willing to come to the TV station to complain, so there are also a large number of rights protection anchors like Tietou.
But there are two sides to everything, some people say that Iron Head was banned because he talked about his PC in the live broadcast, I think this is the fuse, but not all. According to the relevant regulations of our country, PC belongs to "public security cases", and the retrospective period of public security cases is 6 months. Therefore, theoretically, the iron head will be morally condemned in this matter, and it is difficult to find a relevant basis in law to sanction him.
The first reason is that there is a controversy over "fishing law enforcement";
"Fishing law enforcement" has always been a chicken-and-egg controversy, or egg-and-chicken controversy, whether he violated the law before I went, or I went to him to break the law, I am not a law major, you can go and talk to Mr. Luo Xiang.
However, I saw that in the process of Tietou's rights protection, he always defended his rights in the first person, that is, as a party to defend his rights, which is very controversial. Just like the law enforcement principles of our law enforcement departments, they are all stakeholders avoidance principles, and in our interviews, we can often run into relatives, friends, and even our own affairs, but at this time, we will choose to consciously avoid. In the formal system of the state, any dispute involving "phishing law enforcement" and "interest association" must be questioned by the regulatory authorities.
The second reason is, "What qualifications do you have?" ”
The constitution of the country gives news units the "right of press supervision", and of course it also gives every citizen the "right of citizen supervision", but the problem is that when the exercise of "citizen supervision" becomes the professional exercise of "citizen supervision", this is a bit of a taste. You can supervise, but when this thing becomes your profession, then the question is, who gave you the "professional citizen supervision right"?
So in the final analysis, the incident of the ban on the iron head is summed up, in fact, it is the problem of "power sharing", our country is big**, that is, everything is small, everything can be found**, everything is managed, cats can also call 110 on trees, and 12345 for house leakage. But since the era, when everyone can do it, some things have changed, such as rights protection, and it has become possible to "self-help rights protection", which is of course theoretical, but there is a gray area in the basis of laws and regulations.
Although the underlying logic is so, Uncle Wen still agrees with the matter of "rights protection" on his own from his personal feelings, after all, everyone is a consumer, and everyone has a sense of rights protection, which will undoubtedly promote the development of the commercial society and make businesses more regular, but it is still that sentence, too much, rights protection has become a profession, the nature of this matter has changed, and it is not said that there can be no professional rights protection, since it has become a profession, it is a profession that must be supervised, historical facts have proved that Any profession without regulation is distorted, as is true of power, of wealth, and of profession.