I ask you to go to **, the situation inside an item in an empty room, you see it and tell me, this item is square and the inside is empty, but if you are not asked to describe the shape of the object, only let you describe the situation inside the square object, empty, how should you describe it?
That is to say, if you use specific words to express and describe this void, which is convenient for me to understand, can it be called square emptiness, just like if you use words to describe the specific situation and situation of emptiness in a balloon, is the first concept to be a circle, because of the balloon itself?
Back to the previous question.
But if the void is square, then can't it be put in a round container?
That is, the balloon is defined by you, the round empty, can't it be put into a square container?
Obviously, yes, but it's not.
But after you define it, the square seems out of place.
So many times, we don't need to describe it in words, we don't need to define this voidness, because once we define it, it will hinder your intellectual cognition.
Just like the shape of water, it is just round with the square, and the sexuality is clear and clear, and it is the most important thing to observe its nature, not its shape.