Looking at the world, in addition to the GPS satellite system of the United States, China's Beidou system can be called the world's leading. This puts China in a competitive position with the United States in the field of satellite communications.
The increasing maturity of China's Beidou system is gradually challenging the dominance of the US GPS satellite navigation system, and the competition in the communication market between China and the United States is becoming increasingly fierce.
They are unhappy that the American communications "monopolies" are losing market share. They filed accusations in the U.S. Congress against China's Beidou for "unfair competition methods" and took the opportunity to suppress China's Beidou navigation system.
In the face of the threat of U.S. military competition in space, China has not stopped expanding the Beidou system, but has shown strong determination. The United States threatens China with "dare to launch a satellite and shoot you down!" ”
Such hegemonic behavior will only make China more determined to advance its own space program. At a time when China and the United States have entered the stage of war in the space field, will China succumb to the threat of the United States and stop launching satellites?
We'll see.
1. After the success of the US GPS satellite navigation system in the communications market, the space race began to try to monopolize the global market and enjoy the huge benefits it brings. Using advanced GPS technology, they have made a lot of money all over the world and made huge profits.
However, the greedy American GPS is not resting on its laurels.
Seeing the huge commercial value of satellite technology, the United States did not hesitate to use nuclear missiles to suppress it, forcing many countries to abandon research and development. However, China has risen in this gap and developed the most people-friendly Beidou system, which successfully broke the monopoly market of the GPS satellite navigation system in the United States.
The emergence of China's Beidou navigation system came as a big surprise to the United States, and the market value of some telecommunications companies evaporated by nearly $10 billion overnight. The United States, bitter about the breaking of its monopoly, blames China's satellite technology industry for its recent disadvantage.
In order to quickly restore profits, the United States has adopted the means of Sino-US war to curb the development of China's satellite communication technology industry.
The heavy-handed measures of the United States cannot stop the vigorous development of China's satellite communications industry. As a space and communications technology powerhouse, China has its own Beidou satellite system.
In the face of the US threat of military satellites, China did not give in, but firmly developed its own satellite technology. In the name of space competition, the US authorities openly threaten China, but China has long been prepared to respond.
No matter how obstructed by the United States, China will continue to launch satellites and work for the interests of the country and its people.
In the face of the military threat from the United States, China is undaunted and insists on launching satellites to show the world its great strength. The military deterrence of the United States is like a floating cloud in front of us, and it will not work in the slightest.
Innovation can lead the Beidou satellite system has experienced a period of unbearable past, when the United States GPS positioning and navigation was the world's first satellite system, the United States in order to test the smoothness of GPS operation, to recruit free trial personnel from all over the world.
On the surface, the United States warmly invited China to participate, but in fact it secretly carried out a malicious conspiracy against us.
The incident on the Galaxy is enough to wake us up, and the United States has used our trust to get our ships lost in the boundless sea for more than 30 days, and has also cut off our signals many times.
In addition, what is even more shocking is that the United States turned off the GPS satellite navigation system without warning when we were hosting a major event, which almost caused a disaster.
All this has made us deeply aware that the United States is not sincerely inviting us, but is secretly attacking us.
China was determined to develop its own navigation system, but in the absence of high-end technology at the time, it sought to cooperate with the European Union to join the Galileo navigation system. However, the United States secretly operated to make China be kicked out of the European Union after spending 2 billion yuan, and threatened with **: "A developing country has no right to touch this high technology!" ”
In the face of many difficulties, China has not given up the research and development of satellite navigation, but has been actively forging ahead, and after decades of unremitting efforts, it has successfully developed the Beidou satellite navigation system.
The Beidou system consists of 5 basic satellites and nearly 30 extended satellites around the world, covering a wide range of areas, including China and its surrounding areas.
The emergence of the Beidou system marks China's official rise in the field of navigation and no longer relies on the US positioning system.
Since 2020, China has been at the forefront of navigation technology.
Although the Beidou system started later than the GPS in the United States, it has developed rapidly and has quickly become a rising star that even the United States cannot ignore.
In addition to the function of precise positioning and navigation, the Beidou system also has a unique technology in China - short message sending.
In Wenchuan University, the short message function of the Beidou system has played a major role. With the continuous upgrading and improvement of the Beidou system, many Western countries have affirmed the capabilities of the Beidou system, believing that it has surpassed the GPS of the United States, which is known as the "world's first".
Obviously, the rapid rise of Beidou poses a serious threat to the United States' technological leadership in the world. The United States has repeatedly threatened China to stop launching satellites or face nuclear missile strikes.
However, in the face of the US threat, China did not give in and resolutely continued to launch satellites.
Although the United States is dissatisfied, it can only bear it silently, because China not only has anti-satellite capabilities, but also if China and the United States have a military conflict in space, it is likely to lead to a lose-lose situation.
As a result, the United States also had to reconsider its actions.
In order to curb the development of Chinese satellites, the United States has even called for a global ban on anti-satellite experiments. This move is not a finding of conscience, but is aimed at a total strangulation of all countries that threaten its status.
America's intentions can be described as extremely sinister.
In the name of "benevolence", the United States has called for a global end to the direct ascent anti-satellite** test, but there is an ulterior motive behind this appeal. The White House also issued a statement emphasizing that direct-ascent ASAT tests should become an international norm and took the opportunity to publicly criticize the recent anti-satellite tests by China and Russia.
The United States has long mastered advanced KKV anti-satellite technology, and our country also has this technology. Unfortunately, Russia has only tested it once, and other countries have not yet developed this technology.
The United States is trying to prevent Russia and other countries from acquiring this advanced technology, and is far ahead in areas such as air-launched anti-satellite**, co-orbital anti-satellite and unmanned space shuttles, which shows that the United States is trying to maintain its position as the world's hegemon.
China's 2007 anti-satellite test sparked a storm of space debris that reportedly left more than 2,800 pieces of debris in orbit, but the United States did not mention its own destructive anti-satellite** test.
The incident attracted global attention and exposed the threat of space debris to the safety of spacecraft.
In times of war, destroying the enemy's space satellites by launching missiles from the ground is one of the effective means to weaken the enemy's military strength. However, it is precisely the US military that is more dependent on space-based technology, so the successful destruction of space satellites by ground-based missiles will have a direct impact on the overall combat capability of the US military.
Therefore, the United States has taken measures to block the ability of other countries to develop high-tech satellites. In addition, in addition to its ground-based anti-satellite capabilities, the United States' air-launched anti-satellite missiles are also an important tactical means.
The United States has advanced air-launched anti-satellite missile technology that allows it to capture enemy satellites and unmanned spacecraft directly in space. Therefore, for the United States, the use of direct ascent anti-satellite ** is not necessary and can be completely prohibited.
With regard to the proposal put forward by the United States, the spokesman of China directly rejected it.
China is fully comfortable with banning such tests from a strength standpoint, but we firmly oppose the United States using it to suppress other countries, which is only a mask of American hypocrisy. We also call on the United States to abandon other forms of space testing, and that competition between China and the United States in this area is not necessary.
The potential consequences of a transnational space war are unimaginable, and the United States is trying to use its monopoly to prevent China from launching satellites, but this will only provoke resolute resistance from China.
The reason why China can resolutely refuse is not only because of China's strong technological strength, but also because we have strong military and economic strength as a backing.
Faced with this fact, the US authorities may have to consider alternative solutions in the future to solve the problem of their dependence on China for dividends.