In the current Russia-Ukraine conflict, the war situation is extremely chaotic, full of uncertainty and crisis. Russia's powerful military machine poses a serious threat to Ukraine, plunging the entire region into extreme tension and panic.
Ukraine is facing Russia's strong military superiority in this war, and the situation is grim. Whether it is troops, ** or military technology, Ukraine is at a clear disadvantage, which puts it in a difficult situation when it comes to defending its homeland.
Ukraine** under Zelensky has chosen to resist Russian aggression, however, this decision has been criticized. There are concerns about whether such a decision will lead to more catastrophic consequences, whether it will plunge Ukraine deeper into its predicament. Regarding Zelensky's decision to resist, some have hinted that if he chooses not to resist, there could be a different outcome. This includes the possibility that some regions may choose to join Russia through a referendum, raising questions about the trade-off between compromise and resistance.
Ukraine has to face up to the current military dilemma and admit its obvious inferiority in terms of troops, **, etc. Looking at the possible loss of key areas and cities, military assessments show that Ukraine is in a difficult situation.
Looking back at the history of Ukraine as the second largest country in Europe, it stands in stark contrast to the threats it currently faces. From the glory of the past to the current crisis, the Ukrainian people are at risk of becoming a conquered country.
As the conflict escalates, there is speculation that Russia may hold referendums in areas under its control in an attempt to annex more territory. This not only allows Ukraine to lose control, but is more likely to lead to the cession of regions and territories.
In times of crisis, Ukraine expects strong support from NATO and the United States, but the actual assistance has been disappointing. Criticism of the limited support provided by NATO and the United States suggests that the broader agenda is to protect Ukraine rather than make it a second American power.
With limited aid, Ukraine should re-examine its defense responsibilities. Emphasizing that the responsibility for defending Ukraine rests with the Ukrainians themselves, and that it ultimately depends on the unity and efforts of the people.
In this war for the survival of the country, Ukraine has to face the threat of Russia's vast military machine. However, the so-called military assistance pales in comparison. In the case of tanks and planes, the assistance provided by Western allies such as the United States is only a drop in the bucket. This limited support contrasts sharply with the actual needs of Ukraine's defense, like a wave of a hand.
It is inconceivable that the United States has not only limited substantial assistance to Ukraine, but also has a large stockpile of obsolete military equipment in warehouses. This includes advanced tanks, planes, etc., but they have not been sent to Ukraine. This behavior is not only shocking, but also raises questions about whether Western allies really support Ukraine.
The strategic objectives of the United States and NATO in this conflict are a cause for concern. Through the superficial support, in fact, the intention to weaken Russia runs through it. Ukraine plays the role of a victim in this war situation, becoming a victim of achieving strategic goals. Whether this is in the national interest of Ukraine has become an urgent question for discussion.
At a time of national survival, the Ukrainian people naturally expect strong support from their allies. However, the attitude of the United States and NATO shows to a certain extent the indifference to Ukraine. At this critical juncture, the responsibility for defending Ukraine should return to the Ukrainians themselves. **Ultimately, it depends on the unity and efforts of the people.
There is a clear realistic gap between the expectations of the allies and the needs of Ukraine's defense. The United States and NATO are not obliged to turn Ukraine into a military power, which makes aid limited. In this case, Ukraine should re-examine its national defense strategy and actively look for more appropriate countermeasures.
Despite the bleak prospects, resistance remains important for Ukraine. With an active defense, Ukraine can at least reduce territorial losses and maintain a certain state integrity. Resistance is not only a confrontation at the military level, but also a firm statement of national interests.
Resistance is not only a military operation, but also a bastion of Ukrainian national identity. In the face of overwhelming adversity, the Ukrainian people have found their identity through steadfast resistance. The war allowed national identity to be deeply embodied in the resistance and became a common spiritual pillar for Ukrainians.
Finally, we need to think deeply about the complex choices facing Ukraine. Between resistance and abandonment, the Ukrainian people need to balance national interests, security and future development. This choice will not only affect the current situation, but will have far-reaching consequences in the future. How to find the most suitable way out of this crisis, Ukraine is facing a severe test.