Recently, a "passenger accused the flight attendant of not eating in the dining car" sparked heated discussions. **, a passenger found the flight attendant eating in the dining car and blamed him, arguing that the dining car is a place for passengers to eat and that the flight attendant should not eat here.
The incident sparked heated discussions among netizens, with some supporting the passengers' view that the dining car is a public place and that the attendants should follow the rules and not eat in the dining car. There are also people who believe that flight attendants are also human beings and also need to eat, as long as it does not affect the passengers' meals, there is no problem.
This matter cannot be generalized.
We need to clarify the definition of a food truck. A dining car is a place that serves food and beverages to passengers, but it is not the exclusive domain of passengers. Attendants, as staff members, also have the right to use the dining car.
We need to think about the specific circumstances in which things are happening. **, the flight attendant was during the delivery period, and the meal was simply eaten in the dining car, which did not affect the passengers' meals. In this case, the passengers' accusations appear to be a bit excessive.
Of course, if the flight attendant eats and drinks in the dining car, affecting the passenger's meal, then the passenger has the right to remind him.
We should look at this matter rationally. In public places, we should respect each other and understand the difficulties of others.
I would also like to call on the railway authorities to further standardize the management of dining cars and clearly stipulate the code of conduct for crew members in the dining cars to avoid similar incidents from happening again.