The dismissal of the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, Zaluzhny, has aroused global attention after continuous fermentation.
At present, Zelensky has achieved his goal, according to Ukrainian parliamentarian Shevchenko, Zaluzhny accepted the post of ambassador to the United Kingdom, and the final results are expected to be announced in the next few days.
Regarding Zaluzhny's experience, the British media published a long article commenting, believing that Zaluzhny was targeted by Zelensky because of his high achievements.
However, the British media did not approve of Zelensky's approach, believing that Zelensky had taken a bad move, but put himself in a greater threat.
Zelensky and Zaluzhny)
Zaluzhny's prestige is comparable to **
According to "Reference News", the Financial Times published an article commenting on the grievances between Zaluzhny and Zelensky.
The title of the article is "The top general of the Ukrainian army, whose prestige is comparable to **".
The British media pointed out at the beginning that externally, Zelensky is the image spokesperson of Ukraine, but in Ukraine, Zaluzhny's popularity is comparable to **.
Ukrainian MP Alexey Goncharenko noted that it is precisely because Zaluzhny is so popular that the current crisis has been triggered.
This statement is not surprising, and it is also what the British media wants to express.
The British media published such an article to complain about Zaluzhny, suggesting that Zelensky could not tolerate a high-ranking general whose popularity was comparable to his own.
When introducing Zaluzhny, the British media specifically mentioned that Zaluzhny has always behaved modestly and lacks ambition, insisting on the separation of military and government.
This was done to reassure Zelensky, but Zelensky's team did not trust Zaluzhny.
Zaluzhny).Zelensky is suspicious
The contradictions between Zelensky and Zaluzhny became public because of some small things.
A charity meeting run by Zaluzhny was suspected by Zelensky's aides of being a political platform.
What's even more incredible is that Zaluzhny's wife is speaking out more and more frequently on social **, which is considered to be "conveying an atmosphere that Zaluzhny is about to become **".
The rupture of relations between the two sides is the unilateral suspicion of Zelensky's camp.
The British media believe that it is not wise to forcibly replace such a popular opponent just because of these suspicions.
The British media pointed out that for wartime **, a greater political threat than a popular general is the unceremonious dismissal of a popular general.
This is to warn Zelensky that it is not terrible to be a high-ranking master, but what is terrible is to unceremoniously dismiss the person who has made a high-ranking shock, which may lead to more serious consequences.
Zelensky)No one can replace Zaluzhny
Zelensky wants to fire Zaluzhny, and he has the intention of killing two birds with one stone, on the one hand, to eradicate competitors, and on the other hand, to let Zaluzhny take the blame.
The consequences of this can be big or small.
In general, if there is strong opposition from the Ukrainian population, or if the Ukrainian military is seriously dissatisfied, there is a risk of triggering a coup d'état.
To put it mildly, no one can take over the mess of the Ukrainian army now.
As the saying goes, a thousand troops are easy to get, and a general is hard to find.
There are other generals in the Ukrainian army, but the prestige and ability can reach the level of Zaluzhny, and it is difficult to find a second.
And Zelensky and his team are not very capable in the military aspect.
Ukraine is already on the weak side, and if it lets the generals with both prestige and strength leave, how will the next battle be fought?
If the dismissal of Zaluzhny only for military reasons can be justified, now to dismiss the commander-in-chief for political reasons is completely selfish, and his mind is focused on infighting, how can he defeat Russia?