Not surprisingly! In the most difficult moment for the market, financial experts can't help but start talking about leveling**. However, state-level financial instruments do not come out of thin air, they are financed by taxes and must be taken from and served by the people!
Rumors about leveling ** have been circulating for quite a long time, and unfortunately, there has still been no substantive progress, and experts and scholars have been gushing about it, but there has never been a strong response from the highest level to this matter.
Furthermore, even if the state decisively launches a leveling standard for the systemic financial risks that may arise in the capital market, it will never be used immediately as generally assumed. We must recognise that no fund is a charity, and they will weigh the potential impact of various risks, with capital preservation and appreciation being the primary considerations.
As an important part of China's social security system, social security** has always attracted much attention for its investment strategy. In recent years, social security** has preferred to choose ETF products with relatively low risk in investment to make a cautious layout. This is not because social security ** is not interested in large A shares, but because it pays more attention to risk control and is unwilling to easily take over the seemingly harmless flying knife.
From a market perspective, the investment strategy of Social Security** is sensible. In the current environment, the large A** field fluctuates greatly, and the risk is difficult. As a relatively stable investment method, ETF products can provide investors with more stable returns. Therefore, social security** chooses to invest in ETF products, which can not only reduce investment risks, but also obtain relatively stable returns.
However, the investment strategy of Social Security** also reflects the shortcomings of the current market. Due to the lack of an effective short-selling mechanism, the market can only develop in one direction, and once the market appears, investors will face huge losses. Therefore, management should review various short-selling mechanisms as soon as possible to patch the loopholes in this regard. This will not only protect the interests of investors, but also promote the healthy development of the market.
Finally, the investment strategy of social security** provides a good example for us. In the market environment, investors should pay attention to risk control and choose a stable investment method.
At the same time, the management should also take active measures to improve the market mechanism to protect the interests of investors and promote the healthy development of the market. Only in this way will we be able to create a fairer, more transparent and more stable investment environment together.
I was surprised to find that in the context of the continuous sharp decline in the market, there is a general perception that investors are not confident and are even accused of lacking the courage to show fearlessness when others are afraid.
It is undeniable that investors are indeed losing confidence at the moment, but it is important to note that confidence and credit are interrelated, just like two sides of the coin. To discuss only one or the other side separately may be contrary to the objective truth.
Finally, I sincerely believe that from the perspective of the larger situation, the level of ** is only a trivial matter, and we should not be too entangled in this matter, let alone emotional.
Dare to propose that the regulator first calm down the arrogance of the bears, and then carefully cultivate and comprehensively reshape the credit mechanism of the A** market. Only in this way can we promote the long-term planning of China's healthy development!