Alaska is back in turmoil, Medvedev said no need to go to war , the United States and Russia opened

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-05

Your attention is my motivation, and your support is the direction we are heading. Follow me and you can see my latest articles. Appreciate the changes in the international situation.

Recently, the question of Alaska's ownership has once again become the focus of tensions between the United States and Russia. Russia is skeptical of the decision to sell Alaska to the United States in 1867, believing it to be an unfair deal, according to **. Medvedev even said that if Alaska cannot be recovered, he will not hesitate to solve the problem by war.

Alaska, as a strategically located and resource-rich region, was supposed to be part of Russia. However, Alaska was sold to the United States by the tsar for a series of reasons, and this decision became an unsolved case in Russian history. And now Alaska is only 3The distance of 8 kilometers, coupled with its abundant strategic resources, makes this land a bargaining chip for the United States to carry out strategic deterrence against Russia.

In the face of the increase in US and NATO troops and forward deployment in the European direction, Russia must take the initiative to defuse the strategic advantage of the United States. The re-enlargement of historical issues has played an important role in the formation of new contradictions and topics. In particular, on the issue of Alaska's ownership, Russia can warn the United States that historically unequal treaties are not accepted and should be considered illegal, regardless of who signed them at the time.

Russia has put pressure and threats on the United States by recovering Alaska's historical wrongs, thereby changing the strategic posture of the United States towards Russia. This move not only has repercussions at the geopolitical level, but also reflects the thinking and actions of Russian strategic masters.

However, it will not be easy for Russia to solve its peripheral security problems by such means. At present, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is still fierce, and Russia is facing pressure from the international community and Western countries, which is extremely difficult strategically. Nevertheless, by amplifying the historical problem again, Russia can plant a time bomb in the strategic game that could pose a major threat to the backyard of the United States at any time.

At present, the competitive relationship between the United States and Russia is not only manifested in the confrontation of the army, navy, and air force, but also involves the investigation of historical issues. Russia is no longer satisfied with simply defending, but is actively seeking strategic superiority by creating historical problems and new contradictions, thereby increasing the strategic uncertainty of the United States.

In this competitive relationship, historical issues become part of strategy, not just the strategic confrontation that followed the Cold War. At the same time, the reintroduction of the Alaska issue also highlights the strategic mistrust between the two countries.

The strategic pattern of great power competition between the United States and Russia is constantly evolving, not only in military exercises and first-man wars, but also in the introduction of historical wars. Even if Alaska cannot be recovered, Russia's historical problems are enough to worry the United States, so Medvedev's statement is of great strategic importance.

The issue of Alaska's ownership has reignited tensions between the United States and Russia, highlighting the seriousness and complexity of the rivalry between the two countries. The resurfaced of historical issues has not only complicated the strategic game between the United States and Russia, but also exposed the strategic mistrust between the two countries.

As a self-editor, I am deeply aware of the complexity and importance of international relations. In addition to the confrontation of military power, the investigation of historical issues has also become part of the great power competition. Only by understanding history and strengthening the study and cognition of historical issues can we better understand the nature and trend of international relations.

At the same time, with the deepening of globalization, competition and contradictions between countries will inevitably escalate. As a self-editor, we need to continue to study and report on these major international issues in depth, so that readers can deepen their understanding of international relations and strategic competition, and at the same time cultivate their own critical thinking and independent opinions.

Follow me to get the latest and hottest information, so that you can keep up with the pace of the times and understand the latest trends! Every bit of yours, I will remember in my heart; I appreciate your words and deeds.

Related Pages