On January 26, a federal jury in Manhattan, New York, USA, ruled that former Trump had awarded a letter to writer Carol (E. Brown).Jean Carroll) paid $83.3 million in damages for Trump's defamatory comments against her in 2019 and denied the ** charges launched against her by Carroll, an 80-year-old former columnist for the fashion magazine ELLE.
In November 2019, Carroll sued Trump five months ago for denying that she had been in the dressing room of the Pordolph Goodman department store in Manhattan in the mid-'90s, damaging her reputation as a journalist. At that time, the court had found Trump Carroll guilty and ruled that Trump's remarks constituted defamation and that he should be awarded $5 million in damages.
The above report is a bit confusing, to put it simply, the New York court first found Trump in the 90s**, then ruled that Trump's remarks were defamatory, and then dismissed Trump's appeal and increased the fine to $83.3 million.
The crux of the matter is does Trump have a **?
I'm not God, I just write out what happened, and everyone judges it.
Trump's accusations are not from police records, but from Carroll's 2019 book What Do We Need Men For, which mentions Trump and Les Moonves (then chairman of the CBS board) against her**, both of whom have denied her accusations. 2019 is the year 2019, that is, nearly 30 years after the incident (1995 96).
Carroll's allegations were not supported by any official or professional body, no DNA or other evidence could be used for criminal purposes, and all testimony was her recollection, and she did not report it to the police in the same year.
The most amazing thing is that she can't remember exactly when the ** case happened based on traumatic experience. Therefore, the so-called testimony admitted by the court turned out to have taken place around the end of 1995 or the beginning of 1996.
When you see this, do you think it's incredible? It's not done yet, and the bigger unbelievable is yet to come.
Carroll's prosecution is based on the Adult Survivors Act, legislation enacted by New York State only in May 2022 that allows victims of sex offenses who have expired the statute of limitations to file civil lawsuits.
In 2022, a jury (6 men and 3 women) in the New York High Court ruled that Trump was responsible for defamation and ** after a three-hour discussion.
Trump, of course, was unhappy with the verdict, declaring it a lie and a rumor, and Carroll filed a further lawsuit, raising the amount of the lawsuit to $10 million.
Then, when everyone saw the results, the New York State jury awarded Trump an additional $83.3 million in damages.
This is the magic of American justice, and what happens when there is a targeted judicial action in the constituencies, voters, and courts (New York is the Democratic Party) against Trump?
In the absence of any criminal evidence, but only on the basis of the 30-year-long testimony of the client and his three friends, Trump could be crucified and robbed of his $83.3 million.
Compared with the Loli Island incident I wrote about, this so-called ** case is worse and the evidence is more sufficient, but so far no big man has been prosecuted.
It is worth pondering whether the US judiciary is fair and independent.
Text: Leisurely