The original intention of the establishment of the "Subsistence Allowance Households" was to provide basic livelihood for the poor in rural areas, those without children or daughters, the disabled, low-income families, and those who have lost their labor force. In recent years, the selection of low-income households has been questioned by many people. Experts suggest: treat the symptoms but not the root cause, replace or cancel the low-income household system. Why are there voices for the abolition of rural subsistence households? Let's find out.
Rural "low-income households" have become fragrant and gluttonous, and black-box operations must be held accountable! Experts: Treat the symptoms but not the root cause
Clause.
First, the candidate has deteriorated.
Individual peasants are not poor, but they have become subsistence households, and they are proud to eat subsistence allowances. Strong but lazy to eat, through relationships or other channels, apply for the qualification of low-income households, do not pay labor, and enjoy this welfare subsidy for farmers and people. It makes those hard-working, hard-working villagers feel unfair.
Clause.
2. Contrary to the original intention.
Individual rural subsistence allowance households have obtained subsistence allowance qualifications by using relationships, improper means, and black-box operations. For example, there is a kinship relationship with relevant department personnel and village cadres. It violates the original intention of this policy of benefiting farmers and people, infringes on the rights and interests of villagers who are really in difficulty, and loses fairness and justice.
Clause.
3. Financial pressure.
Every year, the state introduces various policies to benefit farmers, and a large number of poverty alleviation funds are hundreds of millions, but they do not help the people in need of help, resulting in a waste of public resources and increasing the financial pressure on the state.
The issue of subsistence households has always been controversial, and it is also a topic of discussion among farmers after dinner. The candidates for subsistence allowance households should be based on the principles of fairness, justice and openness, so that the villagers can be convinced, and there is no objection in the village, so that this policy of benefiting farmers will be implemented.
We should reflect on the following three aspects.
First,It is necessary to meet the application conditions of low-income households, so that farmers who are really in difficulty can be helped, through climbing relationships, family wealth, income, stable jobs, etcThose who do not meet the qualifications for the subsistence allowance shall be held accountable for fraudulent claims, and the illegal income shall be recovered, and the relevant responsible persons shall be severely punished.
Second,Relevant departments have strengthened the supervision and management of subsistence allowance households and relevant responsible persons to ensure fairness and justice. As the saying goes: "Saving the emergency does not help the poor", "Treating the symptoms does not cure the root cause". Help low-income households to re-enter the workforce, so that they understand that only by paying is rewarded, and relying on their own labor income to support themselves and their families.
Third,We will spend the funds to benefit farmers and benefit the people on the "cutting edge", innovate the assistance model, gradually adjust the subsistence allowance policy, reduce the financial pressure of the state, and improve the quality of life and economic income for the people in need.
Optimize poverty alleviation policies and reduce the number of poor householdsThe ancients said: "It is better to teach a man to fish than to teach him to fish." Strengthen publicity and education, guide the needy people to find employment, learn a skill and technology, help poor households and low-income households to achieve self-reliance, obtain rewards through labor, establish correct values and outlook on life, and treat both the symptoms and the root cause.
From the beginning of its establishment to the present, it has helped thousands of rural lonely elderly people, disabled people, people who have lost their ability to work and income, solved the problems of daily life, and made indelible contributions.
With the rapid development of the times and social economy, the current subsistence allowance system has also exposed various problems. In the future, with the development of the times, the subsistence allowance policy will be reformed or improved accordingly. The ultimate goal is to help the people who are really in need and help the harmonious, stable and orderly development of rural areas.