He actually protested by self immolation! Israel is ashamed, and the United States evokes a nightma

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-27

In this world, there are people who choose extreme ways to express their innermost voices......

Recent news reports have revealed that a high-profile incident occurred outside the Israeli embassy in the US capital: a man chose to act radically!

The man wore a camouflage uniform, and he broadcast the entire event to the world via social networks, allowing viewers to witness the shocking moment. This has been removed from the relevant social platforms.

The motivation behind the act was revealed during the livestream, which stated that "I can't be part of ethnic cleansing" and that "I chose this extreme way."

It is clear that he chose this tactic in order to send a message to the world that he is asking Israel to cease its armed activities in Gaza.

Following the incident, the subject was rushed to hospital** in critical condition and on the brink of life and death.

The incident immediately attracted widespread attention from the international community, especially the unusual identity of the man, which brought more attention to the incident.

Initial reports suggest that the man may be part of the U.S. Air Force. Although a spokesman for the U.S. Air Force did not confirm this information at first, it said that it was still being verified.

But later updates confirmed that after investigation, the man was indeed an active-duty member of the U.S. Air Force and an officer.

According to the latest data, the conflict in the Gaza Strip has caused more than 290,000 Palestinians lost their lives!

Although I myself do not approve of the use of such extreme means to express political demands, I believe that such acts should be banned worldwide. But in the face of this person who used his life to speak out for human rights and justice, I can't help but feel a sense of admiration.

Recently, the Palestinian-Israeli peace resolution proposed by Albania was vetoed by the United States in the UN Security Council.

It is no longer a secret that the United States uses its position as a permanent member of the Security Council to provide unbridled support to Israel.

In such an environment, despite the rising global hopes for Palestinian-Israeli peace, they seem to be inadequate.

The difference between human beings and other living beings is that we always have hopes and ideals, but when these beauties are brutally attacked, the pain of that soul often outweighs the fear of death.

This is the tragedy we face today!

In view of the lack of more authoritative reports and official commentaries, I will not go into more in-depth analysis.

However, this news reminds me of the fate of Ngo Dinh Diem, the first ** of South Vietnam, in 1963.

The former leader of South Vietnam, who enjoyed an almost imperial status, ushered in a tragic end after a ** incident.

In 1963, the monk Shi Quang Tak was on the streets of Saigon**, and the authorities oppressed Buddhists. This incident does not seem to have attracted the attention of Ngo Dinh Diem, but has intensified the ** against Buddhists.

The majority of South Vietnam's population is Buddhist, and this incident became a flashpoint of popular anger.

Subsequently, the South Vietnamese army mutinied, and the Ngo Dinh Diem family finally ended tragically. The coverage and repercussions of this incident spread far to the United States, and even prompted the United States to take action and further penetrate the quagmire of the Vietnam War.

History always repeats itself in a striking way, and in the game of power, when the powerful abuse their power, it inevitably triggers the common resistance of the weak.

Discontent in society is brewing, waiting for the spark of that moment to ignite anger.

The ZF of the American is a new event, and I am intrigued by the volatility it may bring. Will this provoke a national and global ** wave? It's hard to say for sure. Publish a collection of dragon cards to share millions of cash

In particular, his military status caused additional concern. "Military anti-war", such a label itself has a strong news value. If this sentiment resonates widely in the military, it could mean a bigger problem ...... for the White House

What do you think?

Related Pages