On February 9, Tucker Carlson, the former host of Fox News in the United States and an independent **person, released an exclusive interview with Putin on social media, which is the first time since the conflict between Russia and Ukraine that a Western journalist interviewed Putin and posted it on social **. **It lasted for 2 hours, 7 minutes and 18 seconds, and once it was released, it immediately aroused widespread heated discussions around the world, and so far, it has been more than 30 million times on the whole network.
In **, Carlson interviews Russian Putin in the Kremlin, and Putin expresses some core points.
He emphasized Russia's position and role in international affairs, saying that it does not seek conflict with Western countries, but also does not compromise its own interests. He also expressed his views on the Ukraine issue, China-US relations, international security, etc., and called on all parties to maintain dialogue and cooperation to jointly address global challenges.
This rare interview has attracted great attention and heated discussions from the world** and the public. There has been a lot of discussion about Putin's remarks, thinking and speculating about Russia's policies and future directions.
In the age of information, every important interview may trigger global attention and discussion. Through diversified channels, we are able to keep abreast of important events and developments around the world in a more timely manner, and deepen our understanding and awareness of international affairs.
However, how to view this information and how to participate in the discussion rationally is a question that each of us needs to think about. While obtaining information, we should also maintain an objective and rational attitude, not be swayed by one-sided or biased remarks, and look at the world from a more comprehensive perspective.
In your opinion, how should reports and comments on international affairs be more objective and fair?