Fifth, the dangerous. I must live first, and stay in Gaoyang to wait for the enemy; If the enemy goes first, the dwelling will lead him away, and do not obey it.
This is the fifth section of Sun Tzu's "Topographical Chapter".
The difficulty in this sentence lies in the word "risk".
The original meaning of the word "risk" is:After entering a certain cognitive system, the direction of this state of effort is completely driven by high subjective emotions driven by desire and selfishness.
There are countless cases in the history of mankind, such as Emperor Yang of Sui's conquest of Goryeo, such as Japan's dream of conquering East Asia. Therefore, as long as the word risk appears in a social group, it first means that such a social group is blind, subjective, and emotional.
Individual subjective emotionality is serious, it is difficult to get along harmoniously with others, and a nation's collective subjective emotionality is absolutely a disaster. Because of this, the Song Dynasty drew on the experience of the Tang Dynasty's excessive mental learning and clarified the importance of "Heavenly Principles". Heavenly principles are equivalent to our rational thinking that respects facts and laws today. We talk about rational thinking all day long, so what is rational thinking?
The foothold of reason must be: the facts after full substantiation.
Hotspot Engine Program What are the well-substantiated facts? First of all, there must be the conditions for dialectics between the two sides, and any fact that lacks the dialectic between the positive and negative sides is inadequate and subjective.
Therefore, once we talk about rationality, we must build on the basis of the dialectic of both positive and negative sides.
The positive and negative sides carry out different evidence, experiments, tests, and conclusions on the study of a phenomenon, and then enter the two sides to testify, as long as they enter this field, the shortcomings and advantages of both sides will gradually surface.
According to the systematic habits of Chinese culture, the dialectic of ancient China was not two sides, but three parties and six small parties. And Confucius even extended rationality to the extreme, which is the well-known saying "threesomes must have my teacher".
This sentence Confucius does not mean that more than three people will have their own teachers, as long as there is common sense of life, this theory cannot be established.
Division, before the Tang and Song dynasties, first meant to be proficient in a certain cognition, and applied to the army, indicating a military commander who was recognized by everyone.
Confucius's threesomes are equivalent to the full dialectical system after the combination of internal dialectic and external dialectic.
Therefore, this sentence should be read as: Three people must do it, and I have a teacher.
This sentence of Confucius is mainly aimed at the way of social management, so it also contains the introduction of a policy, which must have a wide range of adaptability and conform to the interests of all people, so the latter is used "choose the good one."
Sun Tzu's sentence and Confucius's threesome are the same, but everyone emphasizes the same point.
Sun Tzu emphasized and highlighted each one even more.
Of course, Sun Tzu's military path did not clarify the way of personal **, so he effectively filled the gaps in his theory in the terrain.
Sun Tzu's "Topographical Chapter" is also an authentic tunnel, which is equivalent to the "Humane Chapter" of the "Analects".
Therefore, the core idea of the fifth component of Sun Tzu's "Topography" is the construction of a collective rationalist mode of thinking.
According to the law of thinking and principle argumentation: as long as it is a single person, it cannot be described by reason.
Reason can only be called rational if it is a dialectical method based on two or more arguments that are opposed to each other.
There is no such thing as rationality in the individual.
Only through rational thinking can human beings truly enter the system of principle thinking, and after entering the principle thinking, it will have a real role in promoting our understanding of the laws of heaven and earth.
Rationality includes but is not limited to perceptual, perceptual, and rational thinking.
This is the rationalist theory of the East, so as long as Huaxia talks about the school of science, all the people in this school are "bar essences". This is also the basis of the principle of "state-owned contention" in our ancient saying.
When a collective, everyone maintains one voice, this state is the original meaning of "risk". This is what Sun Tzu meant.
Those who are in danger, I must live first, and wait for the enemy in Gaoyang; If the enemy goes first, the dwelling will lead him away, and do not obey it.
Translation:Once a group is allowed only one voice, only one system of thought, and only one mode of life, everyone must immediately enter a state of vigilance, first of all, everyone looks for problems from themselves, looks at themselves outside themselves, and sees the match between the real laws of life and self-knowledge.
This is the ideological system of the expression of the high yang and waiting for the enemy.
Why did Sun Tzu place such an emphasis on personal cognition in the way of war?
We know that once the war starts, everyone, and I'm talking about everyone, even the generals, will be weak in the face of such a large group of people with high combat capability and high intelligence.
If such a group loses its correct cognition, its understanding of the essence of life, its collective all-round perspective thinking, and its ability to defend each other, its constraints will also be lost.
As a result, there will be a militaristic ideology like Japan's. This kind of thinking will not only cause great harm to other countries, but will also cause even greater harm to themselves.
There are countless cases in history where entire clans have been ruined because of this, which is why Sun Tzu proposed the theory of collective rationalism.
Both sides and multiple parties mean that everyone can accept differences, tolerate differences, and see differences at the same time, which is called the collective all-perspective thinking system model.
Therefore, Sun Tzu went on to say: If the enemy is the first, the dwelling will lead him away, and do not follow.
I would like to add a text, if the word.
The word is commonly understood today as "like", "like", "what if", and "hypothetical".
If there is only one meaning in ancient times: that is, under the dialectic of the two sides, they arrive at a state that conforms to the law.
Therefore, this word is often applied as "shun". For example, if you are obedient, you can also use it to become ruo, so if it is also extended to the meaning of following. If you read ancient texts, which were generally translated as follows before the Ming Dynasty, the article can also be made clear.
If the enemy comes first, it means:I don't care who you are or what your origins are, first show me the results of your experiments, as well as the facts, data, evidence, and information that you have publicly argued. There is no master, no authority, no God, no God, no Buddha, there is only one in front of the facts, there is no one, there is no master, no authority, no God, no God,
Sun Tzu's version of de-authoritarian thinking.
Let's think about what is the basis of collective holistic thinking?
If there is no field in the collective, as long as there are people to speak for its authority and standards, then it will be impossible for this field to achieve a full perspective.
Let me give you a case from my own experience.
There was a child, and his mother wanted him to learn the piano, because his mother was also an excellent pianist, so he came up with all kinds of gesture standards, all kinds of strict norms, okay?
This kind of educational result, which child has a natural interest in **, is stifled. So, which mother do I say, do you think your professional skills are important, or is your child's love for ** important? Do you think you can train your child to be a pianist? What do you think your piano brings you to life?
This is the result of human beings being designed by barriers, the first person who invented the piano, the first person who played music, would he care about these things?
If you are disabled with one hand, shouldn't you play the piano?
There is no reason, no humanity.
Such cases can be seen everywhere. The children are really geniuses, and they are all frightened by the barriers.
One of the last words I said to a mother: I said what you are doing now, and believe me that your children will never have any interest in you and the piano in their lives.
So I gave her a very child-like approach: if you let him play, play without rules, even if he will be proficient in playing a song for a lifetime, that is also of great value.
The child is now a teenager, and now his mother is annoyed with the child playing the piano all day long. Many of the techniques are taught by the child to the mother himself, and even to collect the skills lectures of various masters.
This is the meaning of individual life under the collective all-dimensional thinking.
The first characteristic of human beings is to seek happiness, not to seek troubles.
Learning is a joyful thing, so why make "her" miserable? Such a teacher and such an industry are definitely not a successful example of human beings driving the development of the industry.
So, I have to say again that the ability of teenagers to learn to build their own interest is to find joy in the boring looks of others.
If you're not happy, it's 100% wrong, and you don't have to find any authority to do it.
This is the real way to ask the "heart".
Speaking of which, we have actually seen the direction of the life group that Sun Tzu wants to build - collective hedonism, life hedonism.
Happiness is not something that can be happy just by thinking about it.
No one can do it:was chased by a tiger, and while running for his life frantically, he laughed and shouted "so happy"; No one with a terminal illness can shout as if they had won a huge lottery: I'm so lucky.
That's not a problem with the body or IQ anymore, it's a problem with the spirit.
If the enemy comes first:Everything is based on the dialectical results of the two opposing sides and the facts as the final basis, which can be summed up as the basic criterion of collective rationalism as the belief of individual groups.
With such a collective all-perspective cognitive model, everyone is qualified and likely to have and enjoy the value of life brought by true "freedom".
Therefore, Sun Tzu used the phrase "dwelling leads away, don't follow it." "Do the conclusion.
Collective all-perspective thinking is collective rationalism, and collective rationalism is the social state with facts as the standard under collective dialectical thinking, which is the basis and soil for everyone in the collective to obtain true freedom.
Therefore, I summarize this passage as: a happy world in the state of free life growth constructed by collective all-round perspective thinking.
Don't follow, it doesn't mean don't follow, don't choose, but according to your own wishes, judgments, hobbies, interests, emotions, emotions, ideals, etc., you can make any choice that meets your own needs.
That's what we say: I'm happy, I'm happy.
The top social model inspired by the value of individual life in human society is collective all-perspective thinking.
Holistic thinking inevitably leads to a very important result, and that is inclusion.
This is the most complex section of Sun Tzu's "Topography", and it is also the most difficult section to solve.
If we just apply his thinking to our lives for comparison, you will find that as long as you want to enter an industry, all kinds of obstacles, all kinds of restrictions, all kinds of authority, why?
To put it nicely, this is called protectionism. The essence is the degradation of the industry in which self-interests are solidified, self-interests are protected, and self-social status is demonstrated.
The mature understanding of this theory was the most important factor that helped the United States rise rapidly in the 20th century.
At the beginning of the 20th century, dozens of talents similar to these theories were born in the United States, and they promoted the formation of antitrust laws in the United States.
The essence of anti-monopoly law is still collective all-round perspective.
Of course, Westerners prefer to call it social rationalism.
No matter what it is called, the essential purpose is just four words -- liberating human nature.
The essence of civilized society is actually these four words.
Therefore, the decline of religion lies in the bondage of human nature.
Emancipating humanity and individualism are not the same thing at all, and this is a flaw in the culture of the Western world today.
The purpose of emancipating human nature is to strengthen the soundness and development of collective all-perspective thinking, and the purpose of emancipating human nature is to build a stable collective order, that is to say, the purpose of selfishness is to appear in a higher level of selfishness, and the top selfishness of human beings is called selflessness.
This is also a major trick of the ancient "Jin merchants".
Sixth, the far-former. The situation is difficult, to challenge, to fight, to benefit.
The biggest problem with this sentence is the sentence break, and many people will "fight but not, profit." "Understanding is unfavorable for the sake of war." ”
The whole article of "Topography" is about the construction of a reasonable social environment, a humanistic environment, and six systems, each of which is a standard and the principle of guidance.
It's all "good", not "bad".
In the process of sorting out the Chinese military path, the Song Dynasty began to understand the meaning of Sun Tzu's art of war and the true military Taoism of China after Taizong Yanwu cultivated the text, which led to the Great Song civilization since Zhenzong.
However, as far as Sun Tzu's interpretation of "Topography" is concerned, it is still very unsuccessful. If the Song Dynasty had a clear grasp of Sun Tzu's "Topography" at that time, the development trajectory of the Song Dynasty would have changed dramatically, and they would have promoted the progress of human history in a more relaxed and civilized way.
This truth was seen very thoroughly by Zhu Xi, but it was a pity that Zhu Xi was too obedient to the way of heaven. The situation is still just a pretext.
If Sun Tzu had also been "in the midst of the times", the rise of southeastern Chinese culture would not have been born.
The core culture of southern China was greatly influenced by three people: Lao Tzu, Sun Tzu, and Xunzi. And the southeast, which was most influenced by Sun Tzu's thoughts.
Let's take a look at it today, the biggest characteristic of the people in southeast China is still - tolerance.
Therefore, Shanghai will become an international metropolis in the East, not only the impact of policies, but also the policy of many large cities in the country is the same, but why can Shanghai develop into what it is today?
This is a deep cultural gene at work.
Of course, there are several important influential figures in Jiangsu and Shanghai, including a person that few people care about today - Yanghu.
This person is also an outstanding military strategist, and his cultural and martial arts can be said to be a very rare great achievement since the two Jin Dynasty, and has a significant impact on today's Jiangsu and Zhejiang generation.
There should still be a Yanghu temple today, but everyone doesn't know why the ancestors built a temple for this great master.
The Teleformer:Dedication to the pursuit of the eternal meaning of the value of life is the essential law of life. It is the advent of the laws of heaven.
The situation is difficult, to challenge, to fight, to benefit.
The key to this sentence lies in the understanding of potential.
The "potential" in Sun Tzu's sentence can be understood as monopolistic behavior, arbitrary behavior, and a kind of discourse behavior in all fields. The difficulty of equalization can be understood as: the privatization of authority is always prevented.
Translation:
Authority is the incomparable desire of everyone's heart, which is the unavoidable existence of human nature, so the unavoidable human nature, only the correct treatment of its laws can restrain the wrong results brought about by the evil of human nature, we can achieve the supervision and suppression of the private use of authority through "even" and "difficult".
This is called parity.
The more authoritative it is, the more it needs and encourages different ways to challenge, and the result of this is to promote authority to truly form a law enforcer of collective trust, which is the only way for mankind to achieve long-term peaceful development.
Challenge, I translated it directly, in fact, these two words are also well-made**, how to choose?
It is also the application of collective holistic thinking - the existence of two opposing states of group must be maintained. Since these principles have been described earlier, I will not repeat them here.
The challenger must be a long-term researcher and practitioner in the same field, one is a fashion designer, the other is a gourmet, and whoever challenges is a comical existence.
But we have to allow foodies to challenge costume designers, and we have to allow costume designers to challenge foodies, and who says foodies can't be all-rounders? By analogy, we find that such a challenge must have one requirement, that is, "even" and "difficult".
As a practical test of fairness, openness and justice, this test still has an important basis - the development of human collective civilization. We know that the words fairness and justice are conceptual words. What is fairness and justice? How to build? How to maintain it? Who defines it? What are the criteria? is the key, this is the true meaning of the word "even".
Difficult, as the argument of facts and results as the assessment standard.
So we don't care if we're experts in this field or not, we just care about who is more in line with the rules. This is in accordance with the law, not a popular vote, nor an authoritative title, but the result of a fact-test.
We can't blindly advocate popularism, even if it is a collective all-perspective thinking, there is a huge blindness and followership psychology in the mass thinking. Moreover, it is extremely easy to take advantage of.
The masses that are being exploited, the more dangerous. This is the future of human beings must seriously think, how to understand the dialectical relationship between yin and yang of mass power? It is the key to the correct use of the power of the public.
Profit, is the foundation of and.
The original meaning of the word Li is:A distribution system governed by a fair, just, open and transparent Convention that discriminates equally.
Therefore, as soon as the ancients talked about the word Li, they included these contents.
We see that Sun Tzu's way of the earth, the six major sections, but the three yin and yang systems. This is the application of the "three" thinking system, which belongs to the physics and chemistry of "Yi".
All these six are the way of the earth. Will it be: No, yes. No, Cha also.
This sentence is Sun Tzu's summary of the authentic, that is, the summary of the construction of the human civilization system, which cannot be simply understood as "all problems are summarized and summarized by six conclusions." ”
Sun Tzu's "all these six" means:Repeatedly and continuously integrating these six systems, we will become the three yin and yang dialectical collective collective all-perspective thinking, and rationalism under the leadership of human collective all-perspective thinking is the way of civilization for the sustainable development of mankind. This is called - all these six, the way of the earth.
Will it be: No, yes. No, Cha also.
Will, here is not the meaning of generals, but the state of application and widespread implementation.
So this sentence can be understood as:By promoting the height of human collective civilization to an all-dimensional thinking system, human beings will not have extreme and one-sided behaviors, at least after these extreme and one-sided behaviors appear, they can be quickly resolved in a balanced manner.
We know that today's information dissemination method is completely zero-distance, and under this technology and phenomenon, we still find that there are a large number of unjust incidents in human beings.
We can easily find that the radical nature of fans, as well as the influence of interests through the platform and the promotion of capital, if we cannot correctly understand the "collective all-perspective thinking", the risks brought by such technological progress are even greater.
It's so big that we can be far left or far right at any time.
This kind of extreme thinking is a huge potential danger for everyone.
Public utensils, absolutely not for private use.
The basis for the guarantee that public instruments cannot be used privately is the rationalist social form under the collective all-perspective thinking.