Introduction: In recent years, the phenomenon of withdrawal from pre-service training has attracted widespread attention from the society. Some see it as a sign of evasion of responsibility, while others see it as a manifestation of personal agency. This article will focus on the topic of whether withdrawal from pre-service training is considered desertion, in order to provide a new perspective and solution to this problem.
Text: 1. Background and reasons for withdrawal from pre-service training.
Pre-service training refers to a series of training conducted by citizens before their official military service, with the aim of improving the military quality and national defense awareness of recruits. However, with the development of society, the phenomenon of withdrawal from pre-service training has gradually become prominent. There are many reasons behind this phenomenon:
Changes in social attitudes: With the advent of the era of peace, people's understanding of the military service system has gradually faded, and there is also a certain gap in respect and understanding of military personnel. This has caused some young people to withdraw from pre-service training.
The need for personal development: In today's highly competitive society, pre-service training means that it is impossible to further study in school, work, etc. for a period of time. For some people with specific developmental needs, pre-service training can be an obstacle to their development.
Increased psychological pressure: The rigor of pre-service training is higher, and for some people with weak psychological tolerance, it may produce great psychological pressure, leading to withdrawal.
2. Is withdrawal from pre-service training considered desertion?
We need to understand this question at two levels:
Legal level: According to the provisions of China's Military Service Law, citizens are obliged to perform military service. Pre-service training is part of military service, and withdrawal from pre-service training is a violation of the Military Service Act in law. From this point of view, withdrawal from pre-service training can be considered a phenomenon of desertion.
Moral level: On the moral level, we need to take into account the individual's right to choose and responsibility. On the one hand, everyone has the right to pursue their own development, which includes the choice of whether or not to serve in the military. On the other hand, military service is the responsibility of every citizen, and pre-service training may have a certain impact on society and the country. Therefore, at the moral level, we cannot simply dismiss the withdrawal from pre-service training as a desertion phenomenon.
3. How to solve the problem of withdrawal from pre-service training?
Strengthen national defense education: Through strengthening national defense education, improve citizens' awareness of national defense and the status of military personnel, so that young people can more consciously fulfill their military service obligations.
Improve the selection mechanism: according to the characteristics of different individuals, establish a scientific selection mechanism, so that the right candidates can better play their own advantages.
Improve the quality of pre-service training: optimize the training content, pay attention to psychological counseling, and reduce the psychological pressure of trainees.
Implement preferential policies: For enterprises and individuals who fulfill their military service obligations, certain preferential policies will be given to eliminate their worries.
Conclusion: The phenomenon of withdrawal from pre-service training is a complex social problem that cannot be simply reduced to desertion. We need to go deep into the law and ethics to find solutions to problems. Through the joint efforts of the whole society, it is believed that this problem will eventually be properly resolved.