The fifteenth day of the first month has passed, enterprises have started work one after another, and the replacement and purchase of financial software has ushered in a new round of upsurge. It can be said that shopping around is still confused, and everyone looks like a "good student"!
In the last book, didn't Lao Ma already recommend six out of ten to everyone? Still don't know where to start? Well, let's start with the misunderstandings of purchasing, and listen to the old horse's storytelling to help everyone have a mirror in their hearts and make the choice easier!
Myth 1: Blindly relying on brands
1.The usefulness and ease of use of financial software is not high;
2.The flexibility needs to be improved, for example, users put forward some reasonable suggestions, and the function is difficult to optimize or takes a long time;
3.The function of the software is different from the company's own development and financial needs, resulting in a low degree of matching;
4.* If it is too high, the discount is getting smaller and smaller, and the user can only be forced to accept it;
5.The quality of service has declined, customer satisfaction has declined, and we dare not speak out.
The above is the market situation caused by excessive recognition of the brand, which is really the seed of your own planting, and the fruit of your own brewing! Actually, which financial software doesn't have a name? Which one can't be called a brand? If you give more opportunities to other software, it will attract the attention of large manufacturers and enhance the sense of competition.
Brands are created from scratch and gradually formed through time and user accumulation.
Here, Lao Ma did not deliberately criticize, but only objectively stated the current situation of the market.
Myth 2: Excessive reference to the ranking list
1.It's not difficult to get on the list, as long as it's in place, ranking is not a dream;
2.Compare the list, refer to whether the types of software of each brand and the applicable objects are almost the same or very large;
3.The authority of the platform, the standard of evaluation, the authenticity of the data, etc.
Click here and figure it out for yourself!
Someone general: Lao Ma, didn't you just introduce the ranking of the top ten brands of financial software in your last article?
First, we are not on the list; second, the focus of analysis and objective existence; Third, the export of dry goods for welfare.
Myth 3: Overthinking the ** factor
Basically, there are three major factions: the free one is the best; If you want to buy it, buy the most expensive one; Blindly pursue the **low.
1.Think calmly about a few key words: software company profit point, product iteration and upgrading, after-sales service, and data security. In what age can free software still be used? What's more, it's financial software, even the excel accounting system, it's all charged, when can we adjust our free psychology? If it causes privacy leakage and data risk, it really outweighs the loss.
2.The world of the rich is naturally incomprehensible, but it is still necessary to prompt: software costs, management efficiency, functional redundancy, and complex operations.
3.After all, as the old saying goes: no matter how savvy a buyer is, he can't be a seller. We have to consider why the best is low, whether it is a new product launch, or brand promotion, or a competitive strategy, right, whether the financial software can be used, whether it is good or not should be the primary consideration.
Myth 4: Excessive pursuit of the stand-alone version and the permanent version
1.Mistakenly think that this version is the safest, because the data is stored on their own computers, everyone has their own aspirations, do not dissuade, in case of irreversible circumstances, there will be a sudden realization one day.
2.Scalability should be considered, cloud software will add or optimize functions from time to time in the later stage, and generally will not charge additional fees (software charged for this gimmick, everyone should be cautious when purchasing), while the stand-alone version of the software is very limited.
3.The inability to synchronize and share data undoubtedly increases the difficulty and communication cost for enterprises with multiple branches or cross-departmental collaboration, and data inconsistencies and delayed updates may affect the efficiency and accuracy of enterprise decision-making.
4.If you can't work on the move, let's not mention much about the epidemic, and it's best that it won't come again; When responding to emergencies or requiring quick decision-making, the disadvantages of the stand-alone version are exposed, such as leaders to report, overtime at home during the levy period, modification of account data, etc., it is impossible to achieve first-class access, or timely data processing.
Myth 5: Excessive pursuit of advanced features Number of modules
1.If the cost of learning is too high, the requirements for personnel quality will also increase (consider the cost of employment);
2.The more complex the function, the more difficult it is to get started, which can cause the error rate to skyrocket;
3.The cost of software purchase and annual maintenance will also remain high (really, if you have purchased a certain D and Y advanced version of financial software, open the system immediately and take a look at which functions you don't use often, or even click on it once);
4.The number of modules is too large, resulting in redundancy of system functions, remember, we buy finance, accounting, financial software! Can understand???
Lao Ma was blunt:
Whether it's 1200 million individual industrial and commercial households, or 52 million small and medium-sized micro enterprises, how many enterprises can use the super huge financial software system???
In fact, the biggest demand is two points, bookkeeping + tax declaration! Enough!
Publish a collection of dragon cards to share millions of cash