The pros and cons and responsibilities behind the controversy between straw returning and burning
Introduction: Straw is a kind of straw left after the harvest of soybeans, wheat and other crops, which has caused great difficulties to farmers for a long time. For the disposal of crops, some advocate burning, while others advocate returning to the fields. And which method is better for the ecological environment of the land? Through an in-depth analysis of those who deny the return of straw to the field and advocate straw burning, the motivation and effect behind it are revealed, and the causes and effects of straw burning are revealed. This article uses real cases and materials to show readers a clear picture of the field, which deepens people's understanding and understanding of straw returning to the field.
Stubborn arguments.
Some people deny the merits of returning land but hype up its merits, which makes one ponder the motives behind it. Their claim that burning straw increases soil fertility and reduces fertilizer use sounds plausible. But is there a deeper reason for this? In other words, can burning straw really replace returning to the field and make the farmland more fertile? Perhaps, we need to question this statement.
1. Misunderstanding of experts.
There is also a group of self-proclaimed "experts" who put forward their own views on the rejection of national policies and the promotion of stubble burning, and put forward so-called "theoretical support" for them. They have a lot of influence socially, and what they say can often change some people's opinions. However, are these experts necessarily right? Is this support really in line with objective facts? Sometimes, we can also think and ask the so-called "experts" to make their words more reasonable.
1) Specifically for the person who is skeptical.
In addition, there is also a kind of people, whether it is right or wrong, who support everything that is opposed. Such blindly following trends is by no means an isolated phenomenon. Their opinions are often not objective or comprehensive, simply because they insist on a particular position. Therefore, we should be cautious and consider the comments of these groups.
2. Groups that lack correct opinions.
Others are not familiar with the culture of agriculture and believe it only after a period of understanding. They may have worked in agriculture before, or have some knowledge of it. However, with regard to the issues of "returning land" and "burning," the peasants' understanding of the actual situation needs to be further enhanced. After consulting some experts on the Internet, they thought they knew the facts, and such blind following was really thought-provoking.
3. The dissemination of unscrupulous anchors.
The third type is some unscrupulous anchors, who do everything for the sake of traffic. They may not have their own unique opinions, but simply package and promote the comments that are called "professionals". Without a mind of its own, it can only cause more people to have a wrong understanding and make the whole society have a greater misunderstanding of it. In the face of such bad anchors, we should be more calm and not gullible.
Speculation and observation.
How to make rational use of straw is not only related to agricultural production, but also related to soil fertility and environmental protection, and its effect cannot be underestimated. Those who deny the return of land and advocate roasting wheat are usually not all wrong, and they may have their own opinions and interests. But the big question before us is: how can we strike a balance between food security and food security? How can we find the most suitable method in the actual work, play to the strengths, and give full play to the advantages?
1. Reflections on agroecology.
In order to maintain China's agricultural ecological environment, we should look at the advantages and disadvantages of this method from a higher level. Straw is a kind of substance that is returned to farmland, which is rich in a large number of nutrients and has the effect of improving and improving soil fertility. It can be seen that straw returning is an agroecological measure that is conducive to sustainable development.
2. Respect for agricultural customs.
As one of China's major characteristics, agriculture is a fine tradition that has been passed down for thousands of years. For the disposal of crop straw, we should continue to carry forward the fine farming culture, which is a policy we should follow. The implementation of straw returning to the field can not only fertilize the soil, but also improve the quality of crops, promote the sustainable development of agriculture, and increase farmers' income.
3. Deepening of social understanding.
On this basis, further strengthening the understanding of cultivated land ecology and agricultural production is conducive to building a more rational concept and practice. It is necessary to attach importance to the sustainable development of soil resources and promote the ecological cultivation and reuse of crops, which is an important way to ensure national food security and ecological environment. In this regard, we should conduct a rational analysis from a theoretical point of view and advocate a scientific and rational mode of production.
Conclusion: In conclusion, how to choose the right straw disposal method is not an easy task. Therefore, we must take corresponding measures in accordance with our country's specific national conditions and in accordance with our country's specific national conditions. Denying the return of land and advocating only burning is not a long-term solution. It is necessary to proceed from the overall situation of terrestrial ecosystems, based on the concept of sustainable agriculture, and make our own efforts for national food security and ecological security. Let us work together for the development of agricultural products, the benign development of the soil environment, and the future of mankind.