On February 3, local time, there was major news from Ukraine that the most severe military mobilization bill had been officially submitted to the Verkhovna Rada Assembly of Ukraine. The bill is aimed at officers and soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine who have received conscription orders, and stipulates that those who do not report within 10 days will face a series of punishments, including a ban on leaving the country, a ban on driver's licenses, a freeze on bank assets, and the cancellation of amnesties for university students. The introduction of this bill is not only a response to the current dilemma of the Russia-Ukraine war, but also a national-level strategic adjustment for Ukraine to confront Russia's long-term conflict.
The core of the mobilization bill focuses on sanctions against conscripted officers and soldiers. Officers and soldiers who receive a conscription order and fail to report within 10 days will face serious consequences, including:
prohibition of leaving the country and restriction of individual freedom;
It is forbidden to use a driver's license, which affects mobility;
freezing of bank assets, the economy is at a standstill;
The abolition of amnesties for university students has led to the inclusion of university students in the conscription program.
This bill was enacted not only in response to the current Russia-Ukraine war, but also as a national-level adjustment to Ukraine's long-standing conflict against Russia. The bill, which marks the transformation of the Ukrainian state as a whole into a militaristic Nazi structure, means that negotiations have lost their value and can only be resolved through the complete subversion of the other country.
This massive conscription is not only a response to the current war, but also a product of a personal feud between Zelensky and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces Zaluzhny. The success or failure of the conscription program will have a direct impact on the political fate between Zelensky and Zaluzhny.
There is a huge contradiction between Zaluzhny and Zelensky, especially when Zelensky has repeatedly asked the Ukrainian army, Zaluzhny stressed that the manpower needs of the Ukrainian army must be solved first. This highlights the divergence of strategic views between the two, as well as different views on the current situation.
Zelensky failed to correctly understand the strength of the Ukrainian army and the ineffectiveness of NATO's military aid to Ukraine. Still, the focus on the international political arena can lead to poor command of the Ukrainian army, an increase in personnel**. It also reveals expectations and disappointments about NATO's support.
The introduction of this series of bills will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the national destiny of Ukraine, not only at the military level, but also at the level of national institutions and international relations. In the future, Ukraine will face a re-examination and adjustment of its national strategy to better adapt to the current international situation.
The introduction of this mobilization bill is not only a war measure for Ukraine against Russia, but also a landmark event for the whole country. Ukraine will find its footing in this grim war and respond to possible greater challenges in the future through the country's overall adjustment. February** Dynamic Incentive Program