A while ago, the vigorous 11 "warriors" real-name report of the tutor surnamed Huang suspected of academic misconduct, fraud, deduction of subsidies, disrespect for teachers and other bad behaviors have the latest results, the school issued a statement, has verified the content of the students' reports one by one, and it is basically true, the school has dismissed and expelled him.
The report mentioned that Huang had 10** fraud, 2 ** improper signatures, that is to say, he forcibly added his name and other academic misconduct, and the content of the textbook he was responsible for editing was also fraudulent, which is simply a bad record, and it is difficult to write.
The report also made a report on his teacher's ethics and style, and the problems reported by the students do exist, and there are countless financial problems such as fraud, illegal use of experimental funds, and deduction of graduate student subsidies.
The school said that it had stopped their teaching work, dismissed and expelled them, and admired the courage of those brave students and handled the follow-up academic problems for them.
It can be said that this incident has lifted the curtain on the investigation of academic fraud in colleges and universities, and it is believed that in the future, more and more people of insight will jointly supervise and report all kinds of academic misconduct, so as to completely purify the collusion in the academic circles.
However, although Professor Huang received the punishment he deserved, the report did not mention how to deal with the "comrades" who "helped" Professor Huang to act as a tiger, and only said that the other people involved would be severely dealt with in accordance with laws and regulations.
So, who did the ** audit for him? Isn't it necessary to review the publication as a professor? Also, who is reviewing those institutional platforms that publish **? Is there any cat here?
How did he withhold his graduate stipend? Is there a **? I hope that the school can give detailed answers to these questions in the future, and it will also give the academic community a clear future.
As for whether Professor Huang will be punished by the law in the future, I believe that the academic community and the school will continue to pursue it, after all, it has caused such a big impact on the school, this is not just a personal problem, this is a necessary means to restore the reputation of the school.
However, after checking the relevant information, Mugen found that academic misconduct is only a civil dispute, which has not caused serious consequences, and there is no criminal responsibility, and it may not need to serve a prison sentence.
Unless the university charges Professor Huang with embezzlement, ** and other crimes in financial matters, Professor Huang is only discredited and does not need to be arrested and detained.
In any case, it is a good thing to deal with it, and the school has also said that it will continue to investigate the illegal acts of the relevant personnel, and I believe that the school will not let go of these black sheep.
The year 2024 may be called the first year of academic fraud and academic misconduct, and history will remember this moment when 11 brave students gambled on their future and life to uncover the darkness that had been hidden for a long time, so that a sanctimonious lurker like Professor Huang had nothing to hide.
Salute to the 11 warriors and praise Huazhong Agricultural University!
It is also hoped that more academic fraud will be discovered and siphoned off, and students will not be allowed to become the subject of resistance, so that the school and relevant departments should bear the corresponding supervision responsibility.
I would like to conclude with a quote from the warriors: Someone is going to do something that seems stupid, but is right.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program