The storm over the dismissal of the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian military, Zaluzhny, seems to have come to an end. According to reports, Shevchenko, a deputy from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, revealed in an interview that Zaluzhny has tacitly agreed to take over the post of Ukrainian ambassador to the United Kingdom. Although no formal dismissal order has yet been issued, the situation is already in shambles. If Zelensky can't do so, he may face a crisis in power, although Western countries may exert pressure, but in the overall situation, it is not wise to provoke more annoyance at this time.
However, even if Zaluzhny leaves office, the situation will not necessarily improve immediately. Because it is well known that it is not Zaluzhny who is personally responsible, his departure will not remove the root cause of the problem. Aleksandr Dubinsky, a deputy from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, hinted on social ** that the plan to remove the commander-in-chief is steadily advancing, the order has been conveyed through side channels. Now, they only need to find a suitable excuse, such as Zaluzhny's refusal to support the mobilization bill or the refusal to hand over the Avdiivka co-rapporteur, to legally replace him.
However, Dubinsky noted that the most anticipated will be the post-dismissal situation. Whoever succeeds Zaluzhny will face a complicated situation. The new commander-in-chief will not be responsible for all the failures, but the person who was dismissed from the post of the former commander-in-chief Zaluzhny will be held responsible. The news of Zaluzhny's departure has attracted widespread attention, and it is a sign that a new plot is about to unfold. Although there is some truth in Dubinsky's view, the risks cannot be ignored.
Although rumors of Zaluzhny's dismissal are rife, there is no clear explanation so far. However, the public does not seem to be interested in the reasons for the dismissal, as it is generally agreed that this decision is to take responsibility for the massive ** defeat in Ukraine last year. Zaluzhny's removal means he must face the consequences.
However, with the new commander-in-chief in office, Zaluzhny will gradually fade into the public eye. But the shift of responsibility does not end there, but falls on those who remain in office. Although Dubinsky did not name it directly, the implication was clear: Zaluzhny's removal would once again blame Zelensky for the defeat.
The show begins" reveals that Zaluzhny is a dedicated military leader. He represents the traditional values of the Ukrainian army, which are in line with the traditions of the Soviet era, and has become the main fighting force of Ukraine for the past two years. Zaluzhny's departure means that Ukraine will be completely dependent on NATO. Whether it is equipped ** or tactical, it will be carried out according to Western standards. This also means that if Ukraine is still unable to defeat Russia, then the drama will be even more gripping.
However, NATO is not omnipotent. Last year's ** was marked by a number of disagreements between NATO and Ukraine. NATO is trying to impose a law and order strategy on the Ukrainian army, but Russia is not a militant in the Middle East, and simple tactics are difficult to achieve. After returning home, NATO-trained Ukrainian soldiers had to relearn traditional tactics, following the fighting patterns of the Soviet army. The two sides blame each other, with NATO blaming Ukraine for failing to counterattack because it did not act on NATO recommendations, while the Ukrainian military considers NATO's tactics unrealistic. Today, the differences between the two sides have reached the point where they cannot be reconciled. The West may choose to send a trusted ** person to replace Zaluzhny, and then implement the West's strategy to see what the final result is. In this game, the personalities and interests of all parties are intertwined, making the situation even more complex and volatile.