With the changes of the times, people's respect for experts and professors seems to have diminished, and the views and practices of once respected experts and professors on some issues are considered to lack reality and credibility, and are even regarded as antagonists by some people. InAgricultureIn the field, especially on the topic of rice straw returning, the views of experts and professors are questioned. There are articles claiming that rice stalks are returned to the fieldAgricultureSustainability has a negative impact, and this is supported by jargon and data. However, these highly specialized and incomprehensible arguments make it difficult for ordinary people to accept. The topic of continuous debate among experts revolvesSoil acidificationand fertilizer application rates, but these debates are somewhat far from the actual farming operation. ForFarmersThe experience and practice of farming can provide more intuitive guidance. Therefore, the argument over rice straw returning to the field seems somewhat untenable.
The arguments put forward by the experts for opposing the return of rice stalks to the field mainly focus on:Soil acidificationand fertilizer application, etc. They think,Straw returningMay be acceleratedSoil acidification, resulting in a degree of acidification that exceeds that of nitrogen fertilizer application. These theories may sound logical, but for the actual farmingFarmersThese arguments are far less intuitive than the practical experience in the farming process. Experts in theoretical research for:Soil acidificationand other phenomena have been analyzed in depth, but these advanced theories are difficult to be generalizedFarmersUnderstand and accept. And mostlyFarmersThey prefer to judge whether to adopt the practice of returning rice stalks to the field based on their own farming experience, which is one of the reasons why the experts' views are difficult to popularize in field practice.
In the jargon of specialists, there may be some ordinaryFarmersUnintelligible expressions, egSoil acidification, metabolic reversal, and so on, which further pulls apart the expert and practicalFarmersThe cognitive gap. ExperiencedFarmersWe have accumulated a wealth of farming experience in practice, and this experience is often more reliable and intuitive than book knowledge. When experts try to explain the complex in technical termsAgricultureThe question is whether the majority is taken into accountFarmersWhat about practical needs and comprehension? It is also worth pondering whether the theoretical research of experts really meets the needs of field practice.
FarmersWe have accumulated rich experience in the process of practicing farming for a long time, and these experiences are valuable assets that they have summed up in their operations. ForFarmersFarming is not only a job, but also an art, which requires accumulation of experience, observation and practice in order to achieve a good harvest. While the research of experts tends to focus more on theoretical analysis and models**, this is the same as:FarmersThere is a certain disconnect in practice.
Experts for:AgricultureThe angle and level of concern of the problem may be related to:FarmersThis has led to disagreements on some specific issues. On the issue of returning rice stalks to the field, experts have put forward theoretical problems, but whether this is in line with the actual farming experience needs to be further improved and practiced. Professional knowledge is undoubtedly very important, but whether it can really serve the field practice is a question that needs to be deeply considered.
Experts withFarmersIt should be a relationship of mutual respect and common knowledge. Experts should be closerFarmersListen to their actual needs, understand their confusion, and put forward suggestions that are closer to the actual farming. FarmersThey should also take the initiative to learn professional knowledge and absorb new planting concepts and methods to continuously improve their own farming skills.
AgricultureIt is a complex and unpretentious industry, and in this field, practical experience and expertise should complement each other and learn from each other. Only experts andFarmersSincere cooperation can be forAgriculturecontribute more wisdom and strength to sustainable development. Therefore, experts withFarmersIt should not be a one-way guidance and guidance, but should be based on equality and reciprocity, and jointly promoteAgriculturedevelopment and progress.