The reduction of personnel has led to the dismissal of personnel in 5 public institutions, and these 5 categories of people will be forced to lay off!
In China, due to the rapid development of social economy and the reform of the management system, public institutions are a very important work.
To improve the structure of the civil service and enhance the efficiency and quality of the civil service,** a downsizing of the civil service has been initiated to reduce the number of civil servants by 5% as planned.
This policy undoubtedly has profound implications for those involved, especially when it comes to five categories of people who are at risk of being forcibly demobilized.
This paper makes an in-depth analysis of the background, effect and characteristics of the five groups of the implementation of the policy, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for these groups.
(a) Older and less educated staff This type of staff is not competitive in the labour market due to their age and level of education.
According to the streamlining system, they are usually the first to be laid off. For this group, the society should strengthen the education and counseling for their reemployment, enhance their vocational skills and employability, and enable them to smoothly enter new jobs. (b) Temporary and contract personnel are usually not entitled to the remuneration and benefits of the enterprise, and the contract period is short, and most of them do not have long-term stable employment opportunities.
The implementation of the double reduction policy has a great impact on jobs. It is necessary to attach importance to the protection of the rights of migrant workers, improve the corresponding labor laws and systems, and ensure that migrant workers can receive reasonable compensation and resettlement after being laid off.
Third, there are a number of senior professional and technical personnel with high education and high professional level in the industry. However, there are many problems in the system and mechanism of China's universities, which limit their growth space to a certain extent.
After the implementation of the streamlining policy, the best talent is likely to move to other industries with more promising development.
For this group, the state should adopt more flexible policy measures to create a good environment for them to grow and retain. Fourth, some talents who are not in the post have a certain organizational foundation, but due to various reasons, they have not been in place for a long time.
On this basis, in light of the actual situation of the structural structure reform, the vacant posts will be gradually resolved. For this type of talent, it is necessary to guide them to re-enter or change jobs, so that their expertise and work ability can be brought into full play.
Fifth, there are inefficient workers within the enterprise to a certain extent. They may not be able to do their job because of their work ethic, competence or other reasons.
After the implementation of the double reduction policy, this group will be the priority for retirement. On this basis, we should further improve the work performance of civil servants, establish a sound social evaluation system, and promote the improvement of their work efficiency and quality. At the same time, it is necessary to introduce corresponding policies for job transfer and resettlement to provide guarantees for the reemployment of migrant workers. Therefore, the implementation of the system of downsizing personnel is an inevitable trend in the reform and development of public institutions in our country. For the above five groups, they must take the initiative to face the challenges of transformation and improve their employment competitiveness.
At the same time, the society should also take practical measures and give necessary support and assistance to ensure the smooth implementation and smooth transition of the policy.
However, we should also be aware that the streamlining system is not only aimed at optimising the civil service, but also at enhancing the quality and effectiveness of the civil service.
To this end, we must adhere to the people-oriented concept, fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned, and promote the reform and development of public institutions.