It is the previous legal "science popularization" in my country, and the core is to deceive the powerful party, let them take out the money, and share it with the weak party. This is true for the addition of real estate, and the same is true for the bride price. The bride price is not designed to be "brought back to the small family". To put it simply, legally this money is given by the man to the woman, the money is in the woman's account, and only the woman can use it in the state of marriage, and if she is divorced, it is also the woman's personal property and has nothing to do with the man. But in terms of publicity, the impression that the bride price is given to his wife by the man, the wife is his own person, and the money is in the wife's account, so it is in his own home. So that the man is willing to give money. When it comes to "just in case" of divorce, the woman can take the money, and she will be protected as a vulnerable group.
Under the bride price system, if the woman has been married for one or two years and has no joint property of the husband and wife, then the bride price accounts for the majority and the woman is profitable; If the marriage has been ten or twenty years old and the bride price of the woman has been spent, then there is enough joint property of the husband and wife to divide.
For economically disadvantaged women, men are responsible for the payment through marriage transfers. This is the characteristic of Chinese marriage. These designs are unique in the world. But in reality, because the publicity is too successful, a large number of netizens really feel that women have no profit from this system, and feel that the law requires the man to put real money into the woman's account for the woman's disposal, and the woman has no profit and suffers a loss.
And the problem encountered in the past few years is that the first propaganda cannot cover the collapse of the marriage system. A very simple phenomenon is that the marriage market is the same as the real estate market, and the logarithm of marriage registration is its transaction volume. The background is that the income of women in China is an avalanche compared to men, and even the employment of highly educated women in top universities has collapsed in recent years. The data here has been given before. At the same time, the number of marriages has avalanche, and the marriage market has no transaction volume like the real estate market.
Not even the volume,**Come**?
However, the unilateral publicity will implant an impression on everyone, making everyone mistakenly think that the amount of the bride price is "rising all boats". In China, women's incomes have risen sharply, so unsuccessful men can't get women married with money.
But the reality is that China's men's "needs" for women are becoming more and more pure, and they are also rapidly de-responsible. To put it simply, they only want to be "sexual" to women, not "have children and raise the next generation together". So they don't have an incentive to do transfers. The most striking figure is the steady number of abortions in China each year.
If you put together a steady number of abortions and an avalanche of marriage rates, you know that the problem is **.
You don't like it, but that's the reality. So the problem now is really two directions. One is to let men get married as much as possible, take on family responsibilities, and use marriage certificates to distribute their property; The other is to simply admit the reality of this male de-appointment and push out of wedlock.
It's just two paths, and these two roads are like two legs, in fact, they can be walked together.
Moreover, already together are gone.