At present, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which the world is concerned about, shows no signs of peace talks, but tends to intensify. The continuous assistance of European and American countries has made the possibility of peace talks very small, and the protracted confrontation has caused the flames of war to continue to spread to the peaceful areas of the two countries.
Recently, on May 3, the Russian side reported to the international community that the Kremlin had been attacked by drones, which was shocking.
The drone attack on the Kremlin is not only a provocation, but also a serious violation of Russian history and culture. The Kremlin, as a symbol of Russian history and culture, has existed for more than 700 years and is of irreplaceable importance to the Russian people.
This drone attack not only caused damage to the Kremlin itself, but also posed a threat to the reputation and security of the Russian state. The Russian side responded to this urgently, and the level of preparedness and vigilance against drones has increased significantly.
Although this is an intensification of the conflict, it is believed that Russia will respond in a more resolute way, possibly taking reciprocal retaliatory measures to put pressure on the Ukrainian government.
This attack reminds us once again that wars and conflicts bring not only harm, but also damage to human civilization. We should work together to find ways to resolve disputes peacefully and to protect the common cultural heritage of mankind.
Originally, Putin had promised not to carry out a beheading operation on Zelensky, but now, this promise seems to be difficult to fulfill. The drone incident has lowered the bottom line of the Russia-Ukraine conflict again and again, and the contradictions between the two countries have become more and more complicated.
Although the attack on the Kremlin is indeed a heavy blow to Russia, there will be no winners in the war, and no matter what means are used to attack the opponent, only innocent soldiers and broken families will be injured in the end.
Moscow, the capital of Russia, has a palace known as the "Eighth Wonder of the World", that is, the Kremlin. The palace carries the history and culture of Russia, and its artistic monuments are of immeasurable value.
However, the attack on the night of 3 May made it its main target. Fortunately, the reconnaissance system of the Russian army detected the drone at the first time and successfully shot it down.
It was a shocking attack on the Kremlin and a serious threat to Russian culture.
The Moscow Kremlin was hit by a drone for the first time in its 70-year history, but the slightest mistake in this 700-year-old building could be irreparably damaged.
The incident was characterized as an act of terrorism and provoked a response from the United States, Ukraine and other countries. Although the target of the drone may have been Putin, he was not in the Kremlin at the time, but at a working exchange meeting with the governor of the Novgorod region, which undoubtedly gave a positive signal about Putin's security.
While the Russian army stormed the Donbass, the United States continued to encourage Ukraine to launch**, and drone attacks were one of its actions. Despite Ukraine's attempts to justify, it is difficult to clear the name.
On the one hand, he denied that the attack was related to him, and on the other hand, he accused Russia of directing and acting on his own. After the attack, Moscow imposed a no-fly ban on drones, which became a sign of the state of alert of the Russian army.
By studying the materials after the attack, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) The Kremlin attack is related to Putin. As the head of the Russian command, Putin has the ability to command the frontline, and immediately after the attack, the Russian side emphasized Putin's safety, suggesting that the target of the attack was Putin.
Back at the end of April, Germany** reported that a drone taking off from Ukraine crashed near the "Rudpwvo" industrial park in Moscow. This news foreshadows the possibility of using drones to carry out attacks on the Russian mainland.
The recent Kremlin attack coincides with this report. In addition, given Russia's powerful air defense system, it will be difficult for drones to reach the Kremlin without careful planning.
At the stage of the stalemate in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Ukraine is making preparations for a big day. Whatever the outcome, this attack will be a huge blow to Russian morale. What's more, the backdrop of the attack is Russia's upcoming Victory Day parade on May 9, which is the highlight of Russia.
If it is attacked during the parade, Russia's morale will be hit hard again, and the disillusionment of the Russians with the West will deepen. Against this background, bomb-carrying drones (3) have become an important tool for Ukraine.
Russia resolutely responded to the serious threat posed by drone strikes to Russia's internal security. To this end, drone flights have been banned over Moscow, indicating that Russia remains on high alert.
At the same time, despite the tense situation, Russia plans to hold a normal Victory Day parade on May 9. The United States responded to the attack by saying that it did not encourage Ukraine to carry out attacks on targets outside its borders.
Whenever Russia is attacked, it will return intense artillery fire, and this time will be no exception, Russia will carry out massive bombardment and air strikes on Ukraine.
Medvedev's attack has angered Russia, which has already said they will retaliate in due course. There is speculation that Russia may retaliate against Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine.
Although the attack did not cause significant losses to Russia, its impact on the morale of the Russian army was immeasurable, so launching a counterattack could stabilize the morale of the army. In addition, Ukraine's preparation for ** is also about to begin, this air strike and the retaliation of the Russian army are both factors of instability in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and no one knows how the situation between Russia and Ukraine will develop in the future.
However, the attack also revealed two important facts.
In this Russia-Ukraine conflict, drone attacks on the Russian side are rare, but most of these attacks are aimed at important facilities and bases inside Russia. However, attacks on the Russian mainland have become more frequent recently, and in recent days, there have been frequent reports of Russian oil depots being damaged by Ukrainian drone bombs, and this time Moscow's drone attacks are particularly deep.
The U.S. attack on Moscow was like a slap in the face to the Russian army, triggering a strong Russian side and vowing to retaliate in reciprocal terms. It is expected that the next battlefield will be more intense, and Putin's tough leadership style may lead to a strong military counterattack, perhaps a "bright sword" operation.
Three, who is the real culprit? In the current Russia-Ukraine situation, there are not only two countries, but also the US-led NATO forces hidden behind them. Although on the surface, Ukraine appears to be the most likely suspect, given the limitations of its professional skills, the help of professionals must be used to carry out the attack.
There are all kinds of indications that Ukraine and Western countries are likely to be behind the attack. The most obvious thing is that from the Russian-Ukrainian front line to Moscow, only the strong technical strength of Europe and the United States behind Ukraine can complete such a long-distance rush.
Despite Ukraine's lack of such capabilities, the likelihood of Ukraine being the perpetrator of the attack is still very high.
The attack on Zelensky** has attracted the attention of the Western world, however, countries have not commented on it. The drone attack has undoubtedly heightened tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
The Ukrainian side categorically denied any involvement in the attack, saying that it had not launched an attack on Moscow. Considering the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in recent years, if anyone wants to assassinate Putin, then Ukraine is the most likely suspect.
In a situation where it is widely believed that Ukraine launched the attack, Russia has reason to believe that it was Ukraine trying to provoke the controversy over the Victory Day parade in Moscow through a terrorist attack.
Long before the attack, the Russian army had launched an attack on Ukraine's internal military factories, igniting the fire of Ukraine's counterattack. In this engagement, the dynamics of the two countries could change at any time.
The U.S. has played the biggest beneficiary role in the conflict, as it has been supporting Ukrainian equipment, including the Artius-600M drone cruise missile, which has a range of 400 kilometers enough to cover the area from northeastern Ukraine to Moscow, so the likelihood of U.S. technology and intelligence is quite high.
Although the United States justified itself as soon as it was the case, its lies have emerged one after another, and it is difficult to rule out the possibility of its involvement. In addition, the United States has absurdly accused Russia of directing and acting on its own, which raises doubts about the real motives of the United States.
This is *** on the Internet, and we still don't know about the background of this operation and the forces involved. However, whoever wants the conflict between Russia and Ukraine to escalate further is likely to be the driving force behind this incident.
At present, the Russian side also lacks direct evidence that the attack was planned by Ukraine. However, it cannot be ignored that Zelensky** in Ukraine is facing serious challenges from Russia's "special military operation".
Since the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia has been subjected to terrorist attacks, especially the incident on the Crimean road bridge, which caused heavy losses of railway freight trains.
The Ukrainian army has publicly declared that such attacks and retaliation will continue until Russia withdraws from Ukrainian territory. Such rhetoric has undoubtedly cost Ukraine dearly.
In response to this act of supporting terrorist attacks, Russia began to take the initiative to carry out attacks on vital infrastructure throughout Ukraine.
40% of the power stations, roads and important transportation facilities in Ukraine have been destroyed by the Russian army, and in this regard, Ukraine** Zelensky took the initiative to clarify that the Crimean bridge incident was not done by Ukraine.
However, the Russian army has not stopped striking at vital facilities in Ukraine. Therefore, Zelensky's swift denial may have been to avoid large-scale Russian retaliation against Ukraine, but nothing he has done can prevent Ukraine from becoming one of the main targets of retaliation by the Russian army.
The attack in the network** successfully reached the Kremlin, but we can also see from it that Ukraine has not lost confidence and bravely faced the counterattack of the Russian army. In fact, the real purpose of the operation may be to hit the morale and confidence of the Russian army.
Because the Russian army will complete the Victory Day parade on May 9, this attack will definitely be responded to in Ukraine. At the moment, no one can be sure of the duration of this conflict.
We do not live in a world free of war, but in a relatively stable country. The recent Russia-Ukraine conflict has made us cherish peace even more, but this conflict has brought harm and destruction to the people of both countries, reminding us once again that peace is not easy to come by and needs to be cherished.
Although this event did not create **people**, it was a naked provocation for a country, a threat to a common treasure of humanity for a historical building, and for the people of Russia and Ukraine, it could make peace even more elusive.