Lai Qingde stood up and shouted to Chinese mainland!
Recently, in an interview with **, Taiwan regional leader Lai Ching-te shouted to Chinese mainland, advocating maintaining the status quo between the two sides of the strait under the principle of "reciprocal dignity." This statement has triggered a new change, what is Lai Qingde's true intention?What impact do his remarks have on the future development of ***?Is it possible to break the deadlock and achieve peaceful development?This article will analyze in depth the logic and motivation behind Lai Qingde's statement from the following five aspects, as well as the potential impact on ***.
1. Lai Qingde's new variables in the :* of "reciprocal dignity"?
Lai Qingde said in the interview that he believes that it should be carried out under the principle of "reciprocal dignity," and he will not deny that the two sides of the strait have historical and cultural ties, but he will also not recognize that the two sides of the strait are one country, two systems. He also said that under this principle, he is willing to hold dialogues with Chinese mainland, maintain the status quo between the two sides of the strait, and do not seek "reunification" or provoke "reunification."
Lai Qingde's statement seems to be creating conditions for improvement and dialogue, but in fact he is serving his own political interests. As the leader of the Taiwan region, Lai Ching-te is facing pressure from both internal and external sources, and he needs to find a balance between maintaining his "best position" and avoiding *** deterioration. By emphasizing the principle of "reciprocal dignity," he is actually implying that the two sides of the strait are equal sovereign entities, which is fundamentally opposed to the one-China principle upheld by Chinese mainland. His statement is undoubtedly challenging the bottom line of Chinese mainland and increasing the uncertainty and risk.
2. Peaceful Development and Conflict of Positions: What Are the Real Obstacles to Cross-Strait Peace?
In the interview, Lai Qingde also claimed that he believes that "peace is priceless" and that "peaceful development is in the best interests" and that he does not want to see a war break out between the two sides of the strait, nor does he want the people of Taiwan to bear the cost of war. He also said that he was willing to communicate with Chinese mainland to seek a peaceful solution, but would not give up his "** position."
Lai Qingde's statement is self-contradictory. On the one hand, he said that he wanted peaceful development, but on the other hand, he insisted on "the first position, which cannot be both." Both history and reality have proved that only on the basis of the one-China principle can we achieve peaceful development, otherwise it will lead to confrontation and crisis. Lai Qingde's "** stance is a real obstacle to cross-strait peace and a common enemy of the people on both sides of the strait." His remarks are deceiving the people of Taiwan and playing with fire.
III. Conditions for Dialogue and Political Basis: The Key Role of the '92 Consensus.
In the interview, Lai Qingde also put forward his condition for cross-strait dialogue, that is, "reciprocal dignity." He said that only under this principle will he have dialogue with Chinese mainland, otherwise there will be no need for dialogue. He also said that he does not recognize the '92 consensus because the '92 consensus is wishful thinking on the part of Chinese mainland and is an oppression and encroachment on Taiwan.
Lai Qingde's condition is unreasonable. The '92 consensus is the political foundation, the premise of cross-strait dialogue, and the guarantee of cross-strait peace. The consensus of '92 is a consensus reached by the two sides of the strait through consultations in 1992, a fact recognized by both sides of the strait, and the common will of the people on both sides of the strait. The core of the 92 consensus is a Chinese principle, which is the greatest common divisor and the lowest common denominator. Lai Qingde's principle of "reciprocal dignity" is negating the one-China principle, undermining the '92 consensus, cutting off the channel for cross-strait dialogue, and destroying the bridge of peace between the two sides of the strait.
Fourth, does Lai Qingde's statement affect the future development of ***?
Lai Qingde's statement undoubtedly has a negative impact on the future development of ***. His statement not only did not reflect the sincerity and goodwill of ***, but showed hostility and provocation towards ***. His statement not only did not create conditions for improvement and dialogue, but instead laid hidden dangers for the deterioration and crisis of China. His remarks not only did not contribute to the realization and maintenance of cross-strait peace, but on the contrary increased the risk of undermining and threatening cross-strait peace.
Lai Qingde's statement has aroused strong opposition and solemn warnings from Chinese mainland. Chinese mainland resolutely safeguards national sovereignty and territorial integrity, resolutely opposes any form of "** activities", resolutely defends the core interests of the country, and resolutely safeguards peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Chinese mainland has made clear its position and attitude, is ready to deal with any challenge, and has the ability and confidence to defend its national interests. Lai Qingde's statement will only make him fall into isolation and predicament, will only make him pay a heavy price, and will only make him a sinner in history.
5. The complexity and direction of development: What is the role of the politically neutral Taiwan military in it?
The complexity of the situation is not only reflected in the political differences and confrontation between the two sides of the strait, but also in the military confrontation and tension between the two sides of the strait. The military strength of the Taiwan region is an important factor. The military strength of the Taiwan region is mainly composed of the military (Taiwan army) in the Taiwan region, and the size and equipment of the Taiwan army, as well as the political position and attitude of the Taiwan army, will have an impact on the development of the Taiwan army. The political stance and attitude of the Taiwan military are particularly worthy of attention, because whether the Taiwan military can maintain political neutrality, whether it can resist the coercion of "forces," and whether it can shoulder the responsibility of maintaining cross-strait peace are all key factors affecting the Taiwan military.
Does Lai Ching-te's statement represent the position of the Taiwan military?Does the Taiwan military support Lai Ching-de's principle of "reciprocal dignity," does it agree with Lai Ching-de's "**** position," and is it willing to fight for Lai Ching-de's "** ambitions?"These issues are of concern to the people of Taiwan and the people on both sides of the strait. According to some ** reports, the top level of the Taiwan military does not fully support Lai Qingde's statement, and they believe that Lai Qingde's statement is provoking Chinese mainland, bringing danger to Taiwan, and putting pressure on the Taiwan military. The top brass of the Taiwan military are also unwilling to sacrifice the interests of the Taiwan military for the sake of Lai Ching-de's "best ambitions," and they hope that the Taiwan military will be able to maintain political neutrality, concentrate on military duties, and not be politically interfered with or used by politics.
Can the politically neutral Taiwan military become a mediator?Can the politically neutral Taiwan military play an active role in the crisis, whether it can play the role of a bridge in the dialogue, and whether it can play the role of a guarantee in the peace?These questions are all worth asking. If the Taiwan military can adhere to the one-China principle, if the Taiwan military can oppose the "** activities, if the Taiwan military can establish mutual trust and cooperation with the armed forces of Chinese mainland, if the Taiwan military can contribute to the realization and maintenance of cross-strait peace.