Hello everyone! I'm Brother Le! Today's melons are relatively rare, a water conservancy survey and design unit is responsible for a certain project, the inspection team found that the actual geological survey was not carried out in the construction drawing stage, and provided a false detailed survey report in the construction drawing stage. Providing false geological survey reports, it is said that ordinary people do not dare to do this.
But industry insiders may have a different view. Let's take a look at what the penalty report says. 
What's new in rock and soil.
The project involved is a water conservancy and water ecological clean watershed construction project, and the unit punished is the survey and design responsibility unit of the project. The reasons for the penalty are:The engineering geological survey was not carried out during the construction drawing stage, but a detailed survey report was provided. The inspection team found that in the construction drawing stage, the responsible survey and design unit did not carry out geological survey work. The construction project of a small watershed with clean water ecology in a certain city was compiledGeotechnical investigation report (direct detailed investigation).and the preliminary design stage of a design *** preparation of the "a city of water ecological clean watershed construction projectGeological survey reportExactly the same. Including:Text section of the reportEngineering cores, etc.**The number and location of boreholesGeotechnical experiment reportCorrosion analysis report of soilWater quality analysis report and brochureWait. To put it simply, another survey unit in the initial stage prepared the relevant geological survey report, and the survey unit in the construction drawing stage did not arrange the actual survey at all, and directly took the geological survey report in the initial stage as its own report. The nature is, of course, nasty.
But from a practical point of view, there are a few details worth studying: First, can the two survey reports at the initial design and construction drawing stages be used interchangeably? Let's talk about the big guy with the water port. Secondly, there is also a difference between whether the survey unit at the construction drawing stage borrows the report or copies the report of others. Copying it directly and replacing it with your own name and stamp is false information. If it is designed by borrowing the initial report, it seems that the nature is a little better, then back to the first question, can it be used instead? I checked the survey unit involved: the unit is a water conservancy design institute in Chongqing, which has a number of water conservancy design qualifications of grade B, as well as survey grade A qualifications, surveying grade A qualifications, and some construction qualifications. Survey A and Survey A seem to be the only two Class A qualifications. The nature is so serious, the result is only a 4-point credit deduction. I feel that the unit involved has escaped. -- How to have a self-owned Grade A Survey Branch Geotechnical Survey Qualification Grade A Comprehensive A Branch Branch The country insists on writing for geotechnical people every day. Like, **Favorite to express your support.