The fate of small countries is often calculated and sacrificed by large countries, and Palestine in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a typical example of this phenomenon. Palestinian interests are often relegated to the back burner and sacrificed to meet the interests of other great powers. However, there are also multiple political factions in Palestine, which are also often calculating and competing with each other for power.
This was highlighted by an important meeting in Saudi Arabia. Held in secret, the meeting, which included Jordan, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority, focused on the post-conflict political system in Gaza. According to sources, the heads of the security services of Jordan, Egypt, Palestine and Saudi Arabia met secretly in Riyadh for ten days, and the meeting was chaired by Saudi adviser Aiban. The head of the Palestinian Intelligence Service, as well as his counterparts from Egypt and Jordan, also participated in the meeting. The meeting focused on post-conflict management and governance in the Gaza Strip. It is important to emphasize that the discussions between the four political entities were carried out without Israel's consent, and Israel will not comply with their demands for the administration of Gaza.
After the meeting, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Palestine and other countries may send representatives to convey their views to Israel on the involvement of the Palestinian Authority in the management of the Gaza Strip and the governance side by side with Hamas. However, we must be clear that Hamas is currently the organization that governs Gaza on its own, and that they will not easily cede these powers to the Palestinian Authority (i.e., Fatah). The attempts of these countries to completely weaken Hamas's power, or even to exclude it from its administration, are nothing more than wishful thinking.
It also means that the future of governance in Gaza is fraught with great uncertainty. Is it run by the Israelites? Or does Hamas continue to rule alone? Or do you build a union**? If Hamas believes that unity is not good for it, then not only will the contradictions between Palestine and Israel escalate further, but the contradictions within Palestine will also intensify.
The Gaza Strip has always been an important battlefield in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and the conflict on the surface is only the tip of the iceberg, but behind it lies the power game and the tug-of-war of interests of all parties.
The main players in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict are Hamas and Israel in Palestine. Hamas, the ruling Palestinian party, has broad control over the Gaza Strip, while Israel has been trying to control this strategically important region. The outbreak of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is often due to the tense situation and the escalation of violence in Gaza, and the conflict between the two sides has further intensified the contradictions between Palestine and Israel.
However, in addition to the Palestinians and Israelis, other countries and regions have also participated in the Gaza conflict with various motives. These countries often proceed from their own interests, conspire and mediate behind their backs, and try to gain more influence and geopolitical benefits in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt and Palestine are all important countries in the Middle East, and the situation in the Gaza Strip has a direct impact on their security and national interests. As an important pan-Arab country, Saudi Arabia has been trying to play a greater role in regional affairs. Jordan fears that the chaos in the Gaza Strip threatens it. Egypt, for its part, faces conflict and the threat of terrorism along the border with Hamas. Palestine, for its part, sought to achieve its own national self-determination through the support of the international community.
These countries convene meetings in secret to coordinate their positions and actions in order to safeguard their own interests. The focus of the meeting was on post-conflict management and governance in Gaza, which is directly related to the parties' influence and control in the Gaza Strip.
There are a number of political factions in Palestine, with Hamas and Fatah being the two most dominant. Hamas has broad control over the Gaza Strip, while Fatah governs mainly in the West Bank.
The two factions represent different political interests and ideologies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Hamas advocates armed struggle with the goal of restoring Palestinian territories and overthrowing Israeli rule. Fatah, for its part, advocated the achievement of Palestinian national self-determination through peace negotiations and the support of the international community.
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has also been exacerbated by internal strife and power play in Palestine. Different political factions have sought to gain more power and resources through their control of the Gaza Strip, which has led to internal chaos and instability in Palestine.
One of the purposes of the participation of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt and other countries in the Gaza conflict is to try to adjust the balance of power and affect the distribution of power within Palestine. They hope to weaken Hamas's grip by facilitating the Palestinian Authority's involvement in the administration of the Gaza Strip and, ultimately, to achieve internal reconciliation and unity in Palestine.
However, the differences and contradictions between the different factions within Palestine are complex and intractable. On the one hand, Hamas, as the controller of Gaza, will not easily relinquish its power and control. On the other hand, Fatah, as the representative of the Palestinian Authority, is also unwilling to budge. Coupled with the interference of external countries and the game of interests, the contradictions within Palestine may further escalate, posing a greater obstacle to the settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the internal reconciliation of Palestine.
Palestine is often counted and sacrificed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is a portrayal of the fate of small countries. The issue of management and governance in the Gaza Strip has become the focus of the game between all parties, with countries such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt trying to protect their interests by influencing the balance of power. However, this kind of game often further aggravates the contradictions and disputes within Palestine, making it more difficult to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and reconciliation within Palestine.
In the international political arena, small countries are often in a weak position and often become the object of great power games and sacrifices. The fate of Palestine is a case in point, the interests of which are often discarded or relegated to the back burner in the game-tricks and calculations of the parties. In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, in addition to Palestine and Israel, other countries and regions are also conspiring behind the scenes, trying to satisfy their own interests by influencing Palestine's internal ** and power game.
However, we must recognize that the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the realization of Palestinian national self-determination are the key to security and stability in the Middle East region. All parties should respect the will and free choice of the Palestinian people, respect the legitimate status of the Palestinian Authority, and work together to promote dialogue and reconciliation between Palestine and Israel. Only through a just and peaceful solution can we achieve long-term peace, happiness and stability in Palestine and promote peace and prosperity in the Middle East.