Zelensky's dismissal of Zalu, the supreme commander of the Ukrainian military, is a deeper issue. The United States reported that Ukraine** expressed displeasure with Zaluzhny's negative attitude towards the situation ahead, and at the same time, the Western world was also dissatisfied with the terms of the high military assistance provided to it by Zaluzhny. However, Zaluzhny's departure from the position of supreme commander was not only due to the failure of the counterattack, but more because of the dispute between Zelensky and Zaluzhny in Ukraine. This conflict is not only the two of them, but also the forces behind them.
Extension: Ukrainian ** Zelensky is the spokesperson of these multinational ** giants. He was also chosen because of the personal experience of his predecessor, Mr. Yermak. Yermak cooperated with a number of international leaders and served as an important leader of Ukraine, and he was designated as the head of the General Office. He not only helped the ** businessmen of the United States launder black money, but also personally arrested the ** Ukrainian ** giant Kromoysky in return for his generosity to the world's ** giant. Obviously, this world** has an extremely profound impact on Zelensky.
Behind the scenes, Zaluzhny is a world financial organization controlled by big capitalists from the United States and Britain. They have been bearish on Ukraine for a long time, manipulating and controlling the Ukrainian economy. And Zelensky is the spokesperson for these **tycoons, these people are ** from all over the world. The conflict between these two forces stems from their unreconciled common interests.
Extension: International financial institutions have made sustained profits by manipulating and controlling Ukraine's economy. They have a great say in the development path and politics of Ukraine, and in order to protect their rights and interests, they often use some special methods. At the same time, Chinese and foreign media tycoons are using the power of the media to influence public opinion and decision-making in Ukraine. There have long been contradictions between the two forces, and Zelensky will drive Zaluzani **, the reason for which lies in the contradictions between the two sides.
Zaluzhny's complaint shows that he is unhappy with the intensity of Western military assistance, not only in lip service, but more importantly, in his inability to fully integrate into the war. Zaluzhny's dismissal also shows that the company's conflict with ** has become very apparent. This conflict is not only taking place within Ukraine, but is being passed on at all levels. Just as the struggle between the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States, the conflict between the Ukrainian ** and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief has also become very obvious. From this point of view, it makes sense for Zelensky to replace Zaluzhny.
Extension: Zaluzhny's strong military aid to Ukraine is actually a hint that he cannot participate in this great game. Maybe it was because the profits didn't meet his expectations that he was fired. Such an outcome is no coincidence, it is caused by the conflict between the consortium and the ** group. Such a conflict of interest is transmitted to Ukraine through international relations, and as a result, it provokes a confrontation between the leaders of the two parties. In this case, it is logical for Zelensky to replace Zaluzhny.
From this point of view, Zelensky's ouster of the Ukrainian Zaluzhny actually reflects a deep contradiction of interests. This time the conflict has exposed the struggle and game between Ukraine's domestic economic union and **. It is clear that such a contradiction of interests is not limited to Ukraine, but also plays an important role in the game of major global powers. In Zelensky's view, the dismissal of Zaluzhny is protecting the ** group in which he is located, and from Zaluzhny, the dismissal of Zaluzhny shows that the company has played an important role in the situation in Ukraine. It can be seen from this that behind this confrontation, there is a more complex and profound power struggle.
The conclusion: Zelensky dismissed Zaluzhny because of the deep stakes between the two countries. Both in Ukraine and around the world, the confrontation between the fiscal union and the ** alliance is becoming more and more acute. Zelensky, in the name of the "world ** alliance", maintained his influence by firing Zaluzhny. The dismissal of Zaluzhny as the leader of the international financial group also marks the beginning of the group's influence on the situation in Ukraine. This conflict of interests is not limited to Ukraine, but also involves competition between different countries around the world. From this case, the outcome of the war in Ukraine will gradually become apparent. On this basis, we must always be vigilant and deeply reflect on the causes and consequences of Sino-US friction, so as to better face various challenges in the future.