The Spring Festival is approaching, and the office is filled with a strong New Year's atmosphere, and colleagues are talking about the preparations for the New Year, how to celebrate the New Year, what to prepare for the New Year, and other topics such as the New Year's customs in the countryside have become hot. A colleague's sharing made me think deeply: "After getting married, I never spent the New Year in my own house again, not because she didn't want to, but because her parents didn't allow it." Her parents insisted that their married daughter could not celebrate the New Year at her parents' home, believing that it was not good for her family. Ever since I got married, I've found that there are so many rules for girls there. After giving birth, I can't be confined at my parents' house, I can't live together when I take my husband back to my parents' house, and my husband doesn't want to go to my parents' house. Married daughters can't divide the family property, and these rules are so disturbing that they are disturbing. Especially in our country, in the more backward rural areas, these customs are even more serious. I really understand now that people say, 'The more backward the place, the more rules there are for girls, and the poorer they are.'" This remark made me think deeply.
In the process, I saw a profound reflection on the status of women. The poorer and more backward the place, the lower the status of women, and the more constraints they endure. These practices seem to be a cultural inheritance, but in fact they are a denial of women's rights. Those women who return to their parents' homes after marriage are bound as if they were on the verge of a mountain, and seem to have lost the right to communicate with the world. These rules seem to convey a kind of silent oppression to women, making them subordinate in the family. This is not only a cultural phenomenon, but also a serious discrimination against women's rights. Such a social phenomenon reminds me of an ancient adage: "Rules are set by people, but they are often broken by people." ”
This gender discrimination is particularly pronounced in poor, culturally closed areas, where women's status is relatively low and their freedoms and rights are almost completely denied. These rules and customs are like mountains that weigh deeply on women's hearts. Their lives are limited by these stereotypes, and the space for freedom has become extremely narrow. These bad habits have become a kind of "law of survival", and the oppression of women is shocking.
These rules and customs exist, but they are not immutable. In our era of pursuing equality and respect, these bad habits that discriminate against women should be deeply reflected. We cannot blindly accept tradition because of it, let alone tolerate this injustice because of poverty. Women should have equal rights with men, not be tied to outdated rules. We need to work to break down these stereotypes and fight for women's rightful place and rights.
We cannot impose injustice on women because of geographical poverty or cultural backwardness. The more places like this, the more we need to pay attention to women's rights and reflect on these discriminatory concepts and rules. It is only through deep reflection and efforts to change that we can move towards a more equal and respectful society. In this process, everyone should play their part in driving this change.
I want to provoke the reader to think about this topic. Should we still tolerate this kind of discrimination against women in today's society? Should we be more active in speaking out for women's rights and promoting a more egalitarian society? Please leave your views and let's work together on this important and complex social issue.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.