There is a very sensitive point for mainstream academics and folk enthusiasts: is the Sanxingdui bronze civilization foreign? Because this involves the more sensitive topic of whether Chinese civilization is foreign or not, it cannot be left unguarded. However, in my opinion, challenges and opportunities coexist, and this question is precisely an opportunity to sort out Chinese civilization, as I have always insisted: Sanxingdui is an important opportunity, a great opportunity, it depends on whether it can be grasped. My personal conclusion is that the history of the evolution of Chinese civilization is the yardstick of the history of the development of human civilization, and Sanxingdui is one of the important scales.
On the surface, the mainstream academic circles need to be "enlightened", because there are "tasks", so they will be biased towards the east of the Sanxingdui civilization, influenced by the high-tech or Yin Shang cultural radiation in Erlitou, etc., which will not change now, and may not change in the future. If you say a little bit, this may not be a problem of "enlightenment" and "task", but a problem of unspeakable ability, zz theory, conspiracy theory is to a large extent because it is not clear, and the correct attitude can be the best excuse for lack of ability; Mysterious and mysterious, ambiguous, harmless to humans and animals, it is a you guess I know if you know, this is not good.
Folk lovers follow their hearts and intuition, in fact, there is no problem, because facts speak louder than sophistry, and it is natural to give rise to ancient Egyptians, Sumerians, Jews, Aryans, and so on, and these statements are more or less for a reason, as for the reason and look at the arguments, perhaps the result will be beyond the expectation and it is not known. Due to the lack of special training and sufficient data support for folk enthusiasts, it will be very difficult to dissect the mechanism, and most people can only stay at the level of horizontal comparison and simple association of objects, and it is understandable that they cannot take into account the transformation of time and space and historical evolution.
The problem of Sanxingdui, for the academic community, is a problem of ability, and for the people, it is a problem of intuition, and there may be no problem with both, but the problem is that the problem cannot be solved. There is a reason why the academic community has hit the wall and the pit that the people have stepped on, and everything will be clear after explaining the Chinese history and traditional culture such as Sanxingdui culture, Sanxingdui bronze culture, three emperors and five emperors, Xia Shang and Zhou. But Sanxingdui is a super brain problem, and there may be very few people who can persist until the end, and there are too many contents involved, and there are too many super-outline contents.
In fact, many of the people's ideas and statements have been subconsciously influenced by the academic community's "research and judgment", "qualitative" or "conclusive", to a certain extent, the academic community has been controlling or inducing the folk opinions, and the folk seem to be opposing or even resisting the opinions of the academic community, because of poor knowledge, poor information, poor data, channels and platforms, etc., the voices of opposition are all in the same step or with a certain emotional appeal, which is probably ineffective, and it is excellent to explore the unknown and be pragmatic and truth-seeking. But you can't mix it up too much and miss the crosshairs.