The full text is 2200 words, and you have to see the end. 
There was a hot discussion on Douyin before: which is better to use, the nine-square grid or the 26-key, and what is the difference between people who use these two keyboards? 
Some people say that people with 9 square grids have more active brains, while people with 26 keys have limitations in thinking: they are inactive, only have fixed thinking. I analyzed it carefully, and it was really true for me, I always felt that I would not be flexible, more rigid, rigid in detail, perfectionist. I just sat down. It has also been commented that the 9 square grid typing is forever God. Also practiced to mastery, the nine-square grid is faster than the 26-key typing. Then I began to deliberately type in a nine-square grid. Sure enough, I am a person with little wisdom. It's easy to be influenced. Subjectivity is not firm. It should be said that the upper limit of the nine-square grid is higher than that of the 26 key. But I've been using 26 keys for a long time, and I'm pretty fast at typing. The only downside is that the 26 keys are easy to touch by mistake. But 26 keys typing also don't need to be spelled out, and the first letter of the common phrase will come out. So, the speed is still okay, the main thing is to get used to it. Originally, it was a matter of habit, but it rose to personality discussion and intelligence or not, and the reaction to this matter, and what was presented behind it, is still worth thinking about. Let's read on. Fighting game. Your character is a warrior and someone else's role is a gunslinger. Fighters can only fight. Only fighting can embody the value of a warrior. The gunner will fight, as well as shoot at medium range and long range. However, when the Gunslinger is engaged in hand-to-hand combat with the Warrior, the Gunner cannot defeat the Warrior. The gunslinger is very powerful. The Gunner's ceiling is high. However, the gunner can't use both at the same time, can he? The gunner cannot use a machete and a gun at the same time. In hand-to-hand combat, the gunner will die at the hands of the warrior. At medium and long ranges, fighters will be killed by gunners. Winning or losing is just anyone's home field. Warriors are weak and will only fight hand-to-hand with knives. But warriors are not always invincible. It's just that the probability of winning will be smaller. It's a role. I also remembered a question on Zhihu before: I woke up at the age of 30 and wanted to study hard, and regretted the lost time to study. Then he wanted to start from scratch and go to graduate school. Q: Is it advisable to do so? The answer of the Lord is to do what you want, there is nothing you can't do, there are infinite possibilities in life, and you shouldn't be defined or anything, as long as you don't regret it. And the answer of the Respondent is quite the opposite. To miss is to miss. Be responsible for the rest of your life. Now go to graduate school, is it for a degree, or is it to prove something? You should base yourself on the present, make good money, and live a good life in the future. You don't have to be obsessed with reading. Reading to improve academic qualifications is a formality, and after all, we have to return to society to face the matter of making money. Just like this question, everyone has a different answer. Industry.
Each industry has its own ceiling, some higher and some lower. For example, the real estate industry is now in a recession. For those who are engaged in engineering, the upper limit income is not as high as that of programmers (write **). This is determined by the industry. However, the level of remuneration in the industry is not representative of individuals. No matter how good the industry is, it needs people to implement it. If people who are engaged in engineering change careers because they see that they make more money by writing. Will he be able to earn the top salary level in the industry? Hardly. Getting a middle income is also a problem. The best in any technology industry requires not only diligence, but also time. Sometimes it's because of love, so hard work. Such a person can't be caught up by others no matter how much they chase him. He is at the top of the industry's salary pyramid. On the contrary, although the ceiling for engaging in engineering (technician) is not high, it is better to deepen this industry and achieve the extreme, and it is also very good to get 80% of the income of top programmers. Therefore, people can't see an industry making money and plunge into it, or abandon what they already have when they see any benefits, unless it is out of love. Back to the question of the keyboard.
My husband said that you are good at 26 keys, so you can use 26 keys to be proficient, and then make up for the problem of mistouch. Why give up what you're good at and start learning the 9 keys all over again? Yes, it's okay to learn the nine-square grid from scratch. The time to use the keyboard from unfamiliar to familiar to proficient to proficient is relatively short. But this is not the case with choosing a career in life. Be single-minded in what you do. Our energy is too limited. Life is very short, and you can't do much. You can only pick what you can do and do it well. It is more important to continue to cultivate than to start from scratch in different industries. Unless you are still young, or there is no prospect in the industry, and you don't invest much, you can turn around in time. Choose an industry with development prospects and do it all the time, it will not be too bad. You can't get the top salary, but you can still do it if you earn more than the average person.
After a heated discussion on the Internet, I subconsciously felt that the nine-square grid was better than the 26-key one. But I do use the 26 key all the time. I also know that I am a fighter in the game, not a gunslinger.
I feel like a person who has failed in every way, and has not achieved much. Judging from the matter of the nine-square grid and the 26 keys, my first reaction was to see the shortcomings of the 26 keys. This has nothing to do with acquired learning or anything, but my nature is more pessimistic than optimistic. But some people's first reaction is to look at it positively and be firm in their choice. Some people will be firm in the choices they make, while others will be hesitant about the choices they make. And I'm the latter. It is precisely because there are contrasts and differences that you can see your own flaws. Fortunately, this matter can also be adjusted, and through reading, I can strengthen positive psychological cues for myself. Look at things from a positive point of view, rather than a negative one. Of course, in the future, if the conditions are right, voice input will be used more. After all, talking is much faster than typing. After going through some of it, I became more and more convinced of fatalism. Fate sounds a bit pessimistic, but it's not all that. The part that has settled is objective, and the part of the past is objective and cannot be changed. But be positive about your fate. Seven points are destined, and three points depend on hard work. Those seven points are the first 30 years of your life (original family, growth environment, education level, marital status), which cannot be changed. That's why it's so important to start a good game. Those three points are the parts that can be changed in the future life when standing at the age of 30. Studies, career, marriage, and the 3 things that determine the fate of my life, I only have a career left unsettled (if writing can be called a career). Therefore, there are only three points that can be changed, maybe three points is too much. From the controversy of the nine-square grid &26 keys, to the issue of life and career, it is that you should do what is suitable for you in the industry that suits you, continue to cultivate deeply, and achieve the ultimate! There is a pyramid of income levels. The industry determines the ceiling, but your choices determine the ceiling of life!