Miami International's world-class star Lionel Messi, who was scheduled to play in Hong Kong, China, was unable to participate due to injury, causing fans to be disappointed.
The organizer, Tatler Asia, apologized for this and offered to provide a 50% refund for those who purchased tickets.
Messi and Suarez then played in Japan, further sparking controversy.
Tatler Asia will negotiate a solution with ** and the Consumer Council, and will announce the details of the refund arrangement by mid-March.
However, the statement did not clarify the difference between the cost of Messi's appearance and non-appearance in the terms of the contract between the organizers and Miami International.
Rumor has it that Inter Miami offered two **, 1 without asking Messi to play, $4 million.
*2 It is agreed that Messi must play 45 minutes and be $9 million.
If Miami International charges **1, the performance of the contract is not a breach;
Messi is not in breach of contract due to injury or failure to sign a guaranteed appearance;
If the organizer knows that Messi will not appear on the field and chooses **1, he may have accepted the conditions and will not breach the contract.
The specific judgment requires the details of the contract and the communication situation, which may need to be resolved through legal means.
What is puzzling is that Miami International obviously belongs to the American team, but according to the news of Xu Zexin, the Chinese Football Association has suspended relevant cooperation with the Argentine Football Association, including the Argentine national team.
After searching, it was found that the Chinese Football Association had deleted all news about Leo Messi from its official website.