In the previous tournaments, Japan's representative team competed fiercely with the Japanese team, and despite their best efforts, they were unfortunately unable to defeat their opponents.
In the final, the Chinese team lost to the Japanese team by three points, which is regrettable. Despite the best efforts of the players, the situation is becoming more and more serious. The problem was not the poor performance of the athletes, but the tactical missteps of Qiao Shuai that led to the unfavorable development of the game. After the game, Qiao Shuai was condemned by all parties, especially the front-line reporters reacted strongly.
Due to Mr. Qiao Shuai's slight mistakes in decision-making, he made many mistakes, which ultimately led to the loss of our victory. In the first quarter of the game, our team once had a nearly 10-point lead. However, what is surprising is that Mr. Qiao Shuai chose to replace the popular player Hu Jinqiu. Although it may be to protect his physical fitness, Hu Jinqiu has actually played for 40 minutes in the game, which is enough to cope with fatigue. So why did he replace him after just six minutes? Yang Hansen, who took over from the game, did not perform well, scoring in double figures throughout the game. It must be pointed out that although Yang Hansen has great potential for development, his ability needs to be improved and his competitiveness needs to be strengthened. What's more regrettable is that Mr. Qiao Shuai failed to change the lineup strategy in time, which gradually weakened our advantage, and the seven or eight points advantage we had just achieved quickly disappeared, leaving only one point left, and the first quarter of the game was only a line away from the opponent Japan.
Some opinions believe that Dawang has an advantage against the Asian team, but Qiao Shuai did not use him, and replaced him with Yu Jiahao, who is slightly less fast. For this lineup arrangement, we may understand it as a cautious decision by Qiao Shuai.
Unfortunately, our team didn't fully exploit the potential of the top players and ended up with a slightly inferior result. In the same international competitions, there are also significant differences in the selection strategies of local players by national teams. For example, Japan's Yudai Baba has been able to play more than 37 minutes and contribute 24 points. And Hawkinson, who is on the same team, finally scored 14 points in 33 minutes of play. On the other hand, although Hu Jinqiu and Hu Mingxuan both scored more than 20 points, they only played 25 and 28 minutes. What's even more striking is that Zhao Jiwei, who has a low overall contribution, has even more playing time than these two high-quality players, a full five minutes more. Despite the emphasis on meritocracy, it doesn't seem to be really being practiced in our ranks.
In the transition phase of attack and defense at a critical moment, the team accidentally made a third serious mistake. After careful consideration, Qiao Shuai decided to send Zhu Junlong to follow up and go all out to shoot three-pointers. However, this move has aroused strong concern and doubts from many serious commentators. Everyone wondered: What was the reason for this change? Faced with these questions, Zhu Junlong was troubled, and the team members began to look confused and frustrated. It can be seen that Qiao Shuai is under tremendous pressure in this decision-making.
As for the reason for the short passing strategy in the game, Mr. Djordjevic gave an explanation in an interview after the game, saying that the original plan was to create more 3-point opportunities, but the players did not seem to understand and implement it well. As for the answer to the second question, Mr. Djordjevic chose to respect privacy and did not respond. Despite this, many professionals and fans in related fields still have absolute trust in him and have expressed their willingness to continue to support him.
Regarding the controversy caused by Qiao Shuai's command strategy in the game, we do not mean to deny or downplay his contribution. In fact, as some ** and fans gradually accepted the view of "three soldiers with thorns", they raised some doubts about Qiao Shuai's strategic planning and tactical execution.
Some critics have suggested that some of He Jie's shortcomings are one of the main reasons for the team's failure. He advocates that team members should be better identified and more accurate decisions should be made when it matters most.
The Chinese football team's regrettable loss to the strong rival Japanese team really made Chinese fans feel deeply disappointed. As the head coach, Qiao Shuai has been concerned and questioned by the public for improper decision-making at key times, and has endured many criticisms. In fact, we all know that this defeat is far-reaching. As for the coach's poor decision-making and frustration in the results, it is enough to raise deep doubts about his leadership. Here, I would like to hope that Coach Qiao can self-reflect on the mistakes he has made, and make appropriate adjustments in the future competitions, and strive to achieve better results, so as to express his respect for all walks of life and give back to the support and trust of the society.
We invite our guests to provide valuable advice so that we can better cope with this competition and the strategic choices of Coach Qiao. I look forward to all of you showing your wisdom and participating in the grand event to help Qiao Jiaotou improve his decision-making ability. Please show your unique insights in the comment area and draw the light of wisdom together. Please also enjoy sharing this article to let a wider audience know the details of the competition and the mistakes that Qiao Jiaotou may make.