Two committees of the U.S. Congress filed a complaint against the Swiss industrial conglomerate on the grounds of *** threatsabbA letter was sent asking for an explanation of the partnership with Chinese enterprises. The American side claimedabbCooperation with Chinese companies has raised *** concerns. In this regard,abbPublicly explained that they have supplied control and electrification equipment to many crane manufacturers, including Chinese companies. Chinese companies gave the manufactured cranes** to the United StatesPorts。He also said that he would take the US request seriously.
In response to the US threat, Chinese spokesman Wang Wenbin issued a response. He questioned why the US accused Chinese companies of threatening Chinese companies without any evidence, why it targeted China's leading companies, and why it coerced Chinese companies in other countries. Wang Wenbin's questioning reveals the true face of the US side in suppressing China, and appealsInternationalSociety condemns and opposes its actions.
Against the backdrop of US pressure on China, China has taken strong countermeasures. According to customs data, China's gallium and germanium exports to the United States have been completely halted since China announced its gallium and germanium ban in July last year. Gallium and germanium are key materials for the production of advanced semiconductor chips, which are in great demand in many Western countries, and China is in a dominant position in the ** of these two rare elements.
Such countermeasures are not only a response to the US containment and suppression, but also a measure by China to safeguard its national interests and the balance of the world's scientific and technological landscape. If the United States and the West continue to contain and suppress it, China may take stronger measures.
China's spokesman Wang Wenbin pointed out that US politicians keep saying that they abide by the rules and compete fairly, but in fact they ignore the rules, suppress competitors, and deprive other countries of their legitimate development rights. This kindDouble standardsIn the U.S.-China Financial Working GroupMeetingsis reflected.
InMeetingsChina and the United States have engaged in professional, pragmatic, candid and constructive communication, and are committed to promoting the healthy, stable and sustainable development of bilateral relations. However, shortly after the US delegation left Beijing, the US openly attacked China and forbade Swiss companies to cooperate with China. This kind of words and deeds are inconsistentDouble standardsIt's hard to accept.
Through the analysis of this incident, it can be seen that it is unreasonable for the United States to launch a containment and suppression of Chinese enterprises under the pretext of ***. In fact, Chinese companies are committed to playing by the rules and are willing to cooperate with other countries for the benefit of the worldEconomyDevelopment contribution. And the U.S. side toDouble standardsWhile calling for fair competition, we have taken repressive measures to deprive other countries of their right to development. This behavior not only destroysInternationalSocial fairness and justice also affect global scientific and technological cooperation and development.
As a self-editor, you should actively pay attention to and report on such events to reveal the truth and meaning. In the context of globalization, all countries should strengthen cooperation and jointly address global challenges. Only through the position of equality, mutual benefit and justice can we achieve world peace, stability, prosperity and development.