For Mo Yan's inscription in the "Liaoshen Battle Memorial Hall", the emotions and positions behind it are indeed worthy of our deep thought. This is not only an evaluation of a great man, but also an expression of a certain attitude towards Chinese history, culture and people. However, should we completely dismiss all of an individual's achievements and contributions because of his words or actions?
Mo Yan, this name has a pivotal position in the history of Chinese literature. His works, with their unique perspective and deep insight, allow us to see the complexity and truth of human nature. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for his talent and hard work, which is undoubtedly an affirmation of his literary achievements. But as it is said, Wen is like his person, and his works are closely related to his personal experience, emotions, and positions.
As for the relationship between Mo Yan and New China, perhaps we can look at it from a broader perspective. Everyone has their own upbringing, experiences, and emotions that influence their values and positions. Mo Yan may have experienced many setbacks and dissatisfaction in the process of growing up, but this does not mean that he is completely on the opposite side of the people. We should try to understand his inner world, not just superficial criticism and accusations.
As for Mo Yan's works and inscriptions, whether we can see his hatred of New China from them is indeed a question worth discussing. But we should also be aware that a person's thoughts and positions are not static, they can change over time and in the changing environment. We should look at Mo Yan's works and remarks with an open and inclusive mind, rather than simply labeling them as "counter-revolutionary" or "hateful for New China."
In addition, we should also reflect on why Chinese literature often wins international awards for works that depict the bad side of China. Does this reflect some of our problems and deficiencies in literary creation and dissemination? Should we pay more attention to those positive, positive and uplifting themes and themes, so that the world can see a more real, three-dimensional and pluralistic China?
Finally, for literati and artists like Mo Yan, we should look at their achievements and shortcomings with a rational attitude. They are part of Chinese culture, and their works and speeches are also one of the important ways for us to understand Chinese history and reality. We should respect their creative freedom and right to speech, but at the same time, we should keep a clear head and a critical spirit, and not be swayed or influenced by their speech.