At the beginning of this century, the United States instigated a number of "color revolutions" in many countries in the Middle East, such as the Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004, and the Tulip ......Revolution in Gilkes in 2005
A color revolution is a non-violent regime change.
But in fact, it is a movement launched by the United States to subvert the regimes of other countries in other countries under the guise of freedom, democracy, and equal use of encirclement and suppression, money bribery, economic sanctions, and diplomatic offensives.
In 2005, Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, was in chaos.
The angry young man of Kyrgyzstan, wearing a big yellow handkerchief, like a blooming tulip, rushed to the ** building, occupied the ** mansion, and overthrew the regime led by Akayev.
This is the world-famous "Yellow Revolution", also known as the "Tulip Revolution".
However, after the Tulip Revolution, the people of Kyrgyzstan not only did not enjoy the so-called democracy, freedom and equality, but instead divided the whole country, continued infighting, withered the economy, and to this day has not returned to the good state before the revolution.
Akayev, Kyrgyzstan, who had brought them a good life, had to flee to Russia with his family, and since then he has been reused by Russia.
Excellent Akayev since childhood
Born in 1944 on a collective farm in Kyrgyzstan, Akayev was a kind, talented, hard-working learner from an early age, and was always the best among his peers.
When he graduated from junior high school at the age of 17, he was awarded the official Gold Medal. After a short period of study at the Institute of Engineering, he entered a machine factory, became a fitter, became a member of the working class, and received a proletarian education.
A year later, Akayev entered the Leningrad Institute of Precision Mechanics and Optical Instruments, the most famous in the former Soviet Union, where he studied optical skills and computer technology, and successfully obtained a doctorate in technology.
Since then, he has become one of the founders of optical computer technology in the former Soviet Union and has published more than 80 academic works in national and global scientific journals.
His books were selected for inclusion in Soviet university textbooks and he was elected an academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
If such achievements continue on the road of scientific research, he will make extraordinary achievements in the scientific research community.
However, his resume was also an indisputable good seedling in politics in the Soviet Union at that time, and he was destined to be politically chosen.
The natural choice of the root is red**
It was in the year that Akayev became an academician that he entered the sight of the CPSU.
In the late 80s, the Soviet Union gradually showed a decline before its disintegration, and the CPSU urgently selected a group of trustworthy cadres in Central Asia.
In 1990, Akayev was elected as a member of the CPSU, and in October of the same year, he was elected as a member of the Soviet Republic, Kyrgyzstan.
In 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Akayev became the first Kyrgyz leader after independence.
However, after the disintegration, the member states were all siloed and no longer supported by each other like the former Soviet Union, and Kyrgyzstan was in a state of extreme chaos and poverty.
Moreover, although the population of Kyrgyzstan is small, there are more than 80 ethnic groups, and the economic recession has caused more and more intense contradictions between ethnic groups.
In the face of challenges, Akayev focused his attention on diplomacy and economics.
Diplomatically, he advocated the principles of equality, mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence, developed friendly and cooperative relations with all countries in the world, and hoped to receive economic support from every country.
He has openly declared that Kyrgyzstan pursues only economic and humanitarian interests abroad, and does not pursue military, religious and ideological interests.
Economically, Akaif was particularly fond of Roosevelt's New Deal in the United States. He repeatedly referred to Roosevelt's famous saying that a society can only be a democratic society if people enjoy freedom of speech and belief and live in peace and happiness.
In his view, Kyrgyzstan already has the first three things, and as long as poverty is defeated, Kyrgyzstan will become a democratic society that the people want.
Westerners naturally hope that this American-style liberal believer will turn Kyrgyzstan into a bridgehead for the United States in Central Asia. As a result, Akayev became the darling of Western countries, and the United States also strongly supported Kyrgyzstan, building anti-terrorist bases and a huge ** empire.
Thanks to Akayev's efforts, people's lives have been greatly improved, and the country has gradually stabilized.
For this, Akayev was re-elected for three terms**.
However, despite the Americanization of domestic affairs, Akayev still relies on Russia and China in foreign politics, and does not really Americanize.
America's wolf ambitions
Seeing that the United States could not control Kyrgyzstan politically, they began to make trouble of it.
Why, then, does the United States have to take control of Kyrgyzstan politically?
The geographical location of Kyrgyzstan is too important, this country is located in Central Asia, adjacent to Russia and China. If the United States takes control of Kyrgyzstan, it will find ways to further compress Russia's geopolitical space and pose a threat to our country.
The military base established by the United States in Kyrgyzstan is only a few dozen kilometers away from the Russian military base and more than 400 kilometers away from China's border.
Everyone knows the wolf ambitions of the United States.
Akayev also knew that the United States was unreliable, and in order to have a backer, he was not only pro-Russian, but also had good relations with our country, took the initiative to return some of our country's territory, and became a friendly neighbor of our country, and our country also gave Kyrgyzstan countless help.
The United States was furious and began to make trouble in Kyrgyzstan, provoking some incidents from time to time to create chaos in Kyrgyzstan, so Kyrgyzstan began to be unpeaceful.
In February 2005, an American-controlled magazine broke a photograph of Akadev's luxury villa and a pauper child.
This made Kyrgyzstan, which was already in a chaotic situation, once again aroused strong dissatisfaction among the people.
At that time, it happened to be the day of Kyrgyzstan, and the United States wanted to use the election to support the opposition in the democratic movement in Kyrgyzstan.
In order to bring down Akayev, the United States invested heavily in supporting the opposition and training them on how to conduct demonstrations and how to manipulate **. The United States is familiar with these tactics, as they have already used them successfully in other countries.
The consequences of the overthrow of the Akayev regime
In March 2005, Akayev was met with demonstrations by more than 10,000 opposition figures. He could have suppressed it by force, but Akayev, who had always been peace-loving, was unwilling and asked the Congress not to shoot.
His kindness was exchanged for the opposition's eventual occupation of the ** mansion. Akayev had to leave Russia with his family, and then announced his resignation in Moscow.
In Russia, Akayev was warmly welcomed by Putin, who immediately hired him as a university professor in Russia and gave him very high treatment.
On the other hand, Kyrgyzstan has ended the Akayev era, but it has ushered in an undercurrent and constant turbulence.
Since then, Kyrgyzstan has been torn apart, infighting has continued, the economy has withered, and people's livelihood has been exhausted until today.
None of them can work for a long time in this chaotic situation, and some even resign after only one or two years.
Some people ridiculed Kyrgyzstan as another high-risk occupation after South Korea, and even the United States could not accept such consequences.
On June 25, 2022, the current professor Akayev confided in an interview with Germany**
I was actually driven out by the Americans, and the United States should regret it.The Akaif period has become a shining time in the eyes of the current Kyrgyzstan people, who often miss the era of peace in Akayev, and even the era when they were part of China, and want to return to the embrace of peace in China.
However, once the Pandora's box of American-style democracy is opened, it can never be taken back.
Some people say that Akayev is too weak, he is only suitable for scientific research, not for politics.
In fact, Akayev was weak for the sake of peace, for the safety of the people, for the sake of not shedding blood, for the sake of the people to live a happy and peaceful life.
Akayev's idea is also the idea of many leaders of the world. However, as long as there are hegemonic countries, they will be bullied if they are too weak, and it will be difficult for the world to be peaceful and tranquil.
Therefore, in the face of hegemony, we must be like my great China, people will not offend me, I will not offend others, and if people offend me, I will pay them back.
If the leader of a sovereign country does not have the courage and does not have his own position, sooner or later it will be crushed and ravaged by a hegemonic country like the United States, and will eventually be controlled by them and become their appendages.